beautifully-stupid said:
I don't know the physics behind it, I just know that it worked ... for the most part.
The principle idea to absorb/dissipate the acoustic energy that would otherwise be
trying to turn the speaker enclosure into a passive secondary radiator.
For the "typical" (if such ever actually exists) "cone in a box" speaker, when the cone
travels inward, it compresses the air inside the box, causing the box to flex (expand)
180 degrees out of phase with the acoustic signal the cone is trying to reproduce
out the front, resulting in some (minor) degree of cancellation of the signal. The
effect varies by frequency (the box responds -- resonates -- differently), resulting
in potentially-audible coloration (distortion) of the reproduced signal. In really bad
cases, you can hear the box itself buzzing & rattling (really cheap/crappy speaker!).
Another effect is reflecting the acoustic energy (waveform) being generated inside
the box back against the cone trying to generate the signal in the first place,
another form of coloration/distortion.
Yet another effect would be acoustic coupling between adjacent element enclosures
(bass cone woofs inwards, flexing bass enclosure, one wall of which is shared with the
midrange cone; when the shared bass/midrange wall woofs (so to speak), it will
compress the air and act as a driving force coupling to the midrange cone, pushing it
outwards -- you've now acoustically coupled the woofer cone to the midrange cone,
turning it into a passive radiator, and 180 degrees out of phase with the woofer cone.
By putting acoustic dampening material in the box, the acoustic energy that would
have gone to flexing the box instead goes into the dampening material (dissipates
as heat). The dampening material can also serve to isolate and pack down stuff
(wires, etc.) that otherwise might have their own tendency to rattle around.
Another approach to minimizing this effect is to internally baffle the enclosure such
that it's not "regular" -- walls are at odd angles and such -- to disperse internal
resonance. A cube is the worst "enclosure" -- it's one big resonant cavity with
all walls resonating together. Actually, a sphere would be the worst...unless
of course you can master the sphere such that the sphere itself is the radiating
element, kind of a Holy Grail of speaker design. The Heil plasma speaker tried
this -- using an ionized plasma sphere as the radiating element. Supposedly (I
never heard them) worked extremely well, but neighbors wondered why you kept
having tanks of helium delivered to your home! He he!
Years ago, I recall reading about some guy who was trying to cast speaker enclosures
into the foundation of his house...on the theory that a few tons of cast concrete
would make a very inert enclosure. Don't remember the results, but it seemed to
make sense, at least to the lunatic fringe element. Not very practical for the
mainstream populace.
-RDH