First off, thanks to everyone who helped steer me towards the 120P as a potentially more rugged replacement for my current EDC - the Fenix P2D Q5. Also - yourcornerstore.com was great! Excellent price of $120, and I ordered my light on May 14th, received it today on the 17th - I didn't pay for any extra shipping. Way to go, cornerstore! Helps with the instant gratification thing...!
My initial observations are as follows...I know there are plenty of beamshot comparisons out there for these lights, so my statements here are all pretty subjective. This is my first "review" - so go easy on me.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43523/435235280dd0fe9da82aa7698f89a75e1fddab83" alt="Grinser2 :grin2: :grin2:"
note: all comparisons were done with brand-new batterystation CR123a lithium primaries against a while ceiling and wall.
Beam
The P2D on normal-high against the 120P on high is a rather marked difference in beam quality - the 120P has a very smooth (and I mean buttery smooth) transition from hot spot to spill, and WOW, what a beautiful beam this thing has - great usable spill and not a ring in sight. Now I know what you guys mean about such a good looking beam, it crushes the Fenix, in my opinion. The 120P hotspot is visibly brighter than the P2D when they are both on high (non-turbo for the Fenix). The P2D on normal high, has a distinct ring just outside the corona, and the transition just isn't as smooth - it's not even close. On turbo it is closer - and the P2D is brighter and bigger in the hotspot, but again the beam is just not as smooth as the 120P is - the ring is still there - very much there. Plus, on turbo, the P2D heats up pretty quickly, and while the Novatac got a little warm it was nowhere near as hot as the P2D on turbo - hence why Fenix recommends you do not run it on turbo for very long continuously. Turbo on P2D vs. High on 120P has similar sized spill to my eye - however, again the 120P has significantly more uniform brightness all the way out to the edge of the spill, and the 120P has juuuuust a bit more spill when you look at them closely.
Tint
Tint-wise there isn't as big a difference - they are both quite white when turned on against a pure white ceiling. However, if you spend awhile really looking at the differences there - there are a couple. If anything, the Fenix leans towards a "cooler" white - blue-ish, but definitely not the blue you get out of a cheapie LED...just leaning that way. And the Novatac is towards the yellow- most notably in the hotspot. Which one do I like better? :shrug: The Novatac seems more natural, I guess - closer to an incan to my eye.
UI
I thought I liked the clickie format of the Fenix - then I bought the 120P
I have yet to fully play with all of the programmability of the Novatac, but even out of the box I really like the click and press features to get the different brightness levels compared to the Fenix - where every time if I want high its Press on - click, click, click (however, at this point it feels second hand for me) vs. the Novatac - click, press and I am on high, one press and I am on primary then click-click to get to secondary. Click-click-click gets you to max low (wow, is it low!) The click-press to immediately get high from off is awesome - very intuitive.
Ergonomics
The main reason I bought the 120P...and it delivers here. The P2D is very, very slippery and never quite feels at home in my hand. The 120P on the other hand (pun intended) just feels great, the "cutout" for my index finger is perfect, and the gnurled finish on it allows me to grip it much better in my hand. I didn't think the shape of the 120P would be as impacting to the ergonomics before I bought it, but it makes all the difference in the world. Even if they covered the P2D in the same gnurled texture, but kept its original shape, it still couldn't hold a candle to the 120P. Like I said, this is one of the main reasons I bought the 120P, and I must say the difference between these two lights in this category is quite large. Plus, I tend to be pretty hard on my equipment, and while the P2D shows nary a scratch in being carried every day for the past 6-8 months, and it has had perfect reliability, the 120P just feels much more rugged. The size difference was a bit of a surprise in all the pictures I saw, and measurements I didn't think it would be as big of a difference, but the Novatac is a good chunk bigger than the P2D (how's that for a technical term) - while it is certainly EDC-able, it is ultimately not as compact as the P2D - time will tell how much this difference affects my day-to-day. Also, the 120P is a bit heavier than the P2D, as expected, but the difference from a "pocket-feel" perspective is negligible. The pocket clip is a nice feature on the Novatac, I will probably use it quite a bit, as my typical carry for a light like this is the inside pocket of my blazer at work, and I prefer it doesn't knock against the Vic Compact that is also in there.
Appearance
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." Overall ergonomics are more important to me for these tools - function being greater than form for me. I suppose the Novatac looks more "the business" than the Fenix - but they both look pretty decent, I suppose. The emitter itself is a hair off center in both lights - with a small space between the piece that holds the emitter and the reflector itself (I am clearly at the limit of my flashaholic terminology.) - See below.
Finish-wise, I do like the color of the P2D, but I suppose the combination of the color and texture of the 120P are nicer to my eye, and the overall finish of the 120P feels more high quality. The '120P' lettering on my light wasn't perfectly finished out of the box (see below) , but after cleaning it, the print is now uniform. Boy, those titanium and stainless bezels for the 120P out there sure look nice, though!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Whistling :whistle: :whistle:"
In Conclusion
Time will tell. Like I said, the P2D is my EDC, and it will be sitting on the bureau for awhile, as I haul the Novatac for my day-to-day. Is the 120P worth it at twice the price? In ergonomics, looks, and UI the 120P is the king, and it really outclasses the Fenix in my opinion. Beamwise...well, it is hard to compare the turbo of the P2D against the high on the 120P since running turbo for too long really heats up the light, and the manufacturer doesn't recommend it. However, it is ultimately brighter than the 120P - but that is with a pretty decent caveat.
Like I said before, the beam is smooth smooth smooth on the Novatac and is almost as bright as the P2D on turbo, and brighter than the P2D on normal high. Add all that together, and it appears the Novatac is worth it. If I had a bias, initially before I received the Novatac, it was towards the P2D...you never forget your first light - and this one was my first "real" light and I do feel a bit of an attachment to it.
I will be sure to report back in after carrying the 120P for awhile.
Obligatory photos (hopefully they are not too big!):
Comparison
Fenix P2D
Novatac 120P EDC
My initial observations are as follows...I know there are plenty of beamshot comparisons out there for these lights, so my statements here are all pretty subjective. This is my first "review" - so go easy on me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43523/435235280dd0fe9da82aa7698f89a75e1fddab83" alt="Grinser2 :grin2: :grin2:"
note: all comparisons were done with brand-new batterystation CR123a lithium primaries against a while ceiling and wall.
Beam
The P2D on normal-high against the 120P on high is a rather marked difference in beam quality - the 120P has a very smooth (and I mean buttery smooth) transition from hot spot to spill, and WOW, what a beautiful beam this thing has - great usable spill and not a ring in sight. Now I know what you guys mean about such a good looking beam, it crushes the Fenix, in my opinion. The 120P hotspot is visibly brighter than the P2D when they are both on high (non-turbo for the Fenix). The P2D on normal high, has a distinct ring just outside the corona, and the transition just isn't as smooth - it's not even close. On turbo it is closer - and the P2D is brighter and bigger in the hotspot, but again the beam is just not as smooth as the 120P is - the ring is still there - very much there. Plus, on turbo, the P2D heats up pretty quickly, and while the Novatac got a little warm it was nowhere near as hot as the P2D on turbo - hence why Fenix recommends you do not run it on turbo for very long continuously. Turbo on P2D vs. High on 120P has similar sized spill to my eye - however, again the 120P has significantly more uniform brightness all the way out to the edge of the spill, and the 120P has juuuuust a bit more spill when you look at them closely.
Tint
Tint-wise there isn't as big a difference - they are both quite white when turned on against a pure white ceiling. However, if you spend awhile really looking at the differences there - there are a couple. If anything, the Fenix leans towards a "cooler" white - blue-ish, but definitely not the blue you get out of a cheapie LED...just leaning that way. And the Novatac is towards the yellow- most notably in the hotspot. Which one do I like better? :shrug: The Novatac seems more natural, I guess - closer to an incan to my eye.
UI
I thought I liked the clickie format of the Fenix - then I bought the 120P
Ergonomics
The main reason I bought the 120P...and it delivers here. The P2D is very, very slippery and never quite feels at home in my hand. The 120P on the other hand (pun intended) just feels great, the "cutout" for my index finger is perfect, and the gnurled finish on it allows me to grip it much better in my hand. I didn't think the shape of the 120P would be as impacting to the ergonomics before I bought it, but it makes all the difference in the world. Even if they covered the P2D in the same gnurled texture, but kept its original shape, it still couldn't hold a candle to the 120P. Like I said, this is one of the main reasons I bought the 120P, and I must say the difference between these two lights in this category is quite large. Plus, I tend to be pretty hard on my equipment, and while the P2D shows nary a scratch in being carried every day for the past 6-8 months, and it has had perfect reliability, the 120P just feels much more rugged. The size difference was a bit of a surprise in all the pictures I saw, and measurements I didn't think it would be as big of a difference, but the Novatac is a good chunk bigger than the P2D (how's that for a technical term) - while it is certainly EDC-able, it is ultimately not as compact as the P2D - time will tell how much this difference affects my day-to-day. Also, the 120P is a bit heavier than the P2D, as expected, but the difference from a "pocket-feel" perspective is negligible. The pocket clip is a nice feature on the Novatac, I will probably use it quite a bit, as my typical carry for a light like this is the inside pocket of my blazer at work, and I prefer it doesn't knock against the Vic Compact that is also in there.
Appearance
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." Overall ergonomics are more important to me for these tools - function being greater than form for me. I suppose the Novatac looks more "the business" than the Fenix - but they both look pretty decent, I suppose. The emitter itself is a hair off center in both lights - with a small space between the piece that holds the emitter and the reflector itself (I am clearly at the limit of my flashaholic terminology.) - See below.
Finish-wise, I do like the color of the P2D, but I suppose the combination of the color and texture of the 120P are nicer to my eye, and the overall finish of the 120P feels more high quality. The '120P' lettering on my light wasn't perfectly finished out of the box (see below) , but after cleaning it, the print is now uniform. Boy, those titanium and stainless bezels for the 120P out there sure look nice, though!
In Conclusion
Time will tell. Like I said, the P2D is my EDC, and it will be sitting on the bureau for awhile, as I haul the Novatac for my day-to-day. Is the 120P worth it at twice the price? In ergonomics, looks, and UI the 120P is the king, and it really outclasses the Fenix in my opinion. Beamwise...well, it is hard to compare the turbo of the P2D against the high on the 120P since running turbo for too long really heats up the light, and the manufacturer doesn't recommend it. However, it is ultimately brighter than the 120P - but that is with a pretty decent caveat.
Like I said before, the beam is smooth smooth smooth on the Novatac and is almost as bright as the P2D on turbo, and brighter than the P2D on normal high. Add all that together, and it appears the Novatac is worth it. If I had a bias, initially before I received the Novatac, it was towards the P2D...you never forget your first light - and this one was my first "real" light and I do feel a bit of an attachment to it.
I will be sure to report back in after carrying the 120P for awhile.
Obligatory photos (hopefully they are not too big!):
Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fbb4/7fbb429299a711ff655be7e1a9dd130b1acd6eed" alt="2500529278_5e4f79b22a_o.jpg"
Fenix P2D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/845f0/845f0e000052a68efc3d5ada93ef2c8d804c7384" alt="2500640392_abf21196c4_o.jpg"
Novatac 120P EDC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abf00/abf00a14b50698a8734d84a75975f92e7c02ec6a" alt="2499810795_6e71f24253_o.jpg"