Darell
Flashaholic
[ QUOTE ]
Minjin said:
Darrel has spoken in the past of how he's able to charge up his million dollar EV at public charging stations for free. Now he's talking about selling that power back?? I call that double dipping.
[/ QUOTE ]
Mark - I'm still sorry that you think I'm such a "taker."
1. There is no way to extract the power from either of my EVs except to power the car. Whatever manages to get into the car is never sold. I'm hoping that one day that'll change, but that's how it is for now. And I don't want it to change so that I can steal and "double dip" I want it that way so I can help eliminate the need for more power plants. I use public charging when I need it so that I can avoid taking a gas car on longer trips. Again, I go through this extra hassle to *help* society, not to steal from it.
2. The $1 million pricetag for the EV1 is provided somewhat tongue-in-cheek. GM was free to set the MSRP on these wherever they wanted, and it was, if I remember correctly, $36,000. GM *claims* that the the entire EV1 program to produce 1000 cars cost them $1 billion. It was their choice not to amortize that (REALLY SMALL as compared to regular car develeopment monies) developement money over many, many more cars. If the $1 billion has been 100% absorbed in the fist 1000 cars, then the next ones off the line will cost about $20,000 to build. Bargain! Saaby will quickly tell you that 1$ billion is peanuts for new vehicle development. GM spends more than that on face-lifts for cars it has been selling for decades.
[ QUOTE ]
Its nice that Darrel and others have completely characterized me from a single line of text.
[/ QUOTE ]
Your statement at the top of this post would indicate that we characterized your comment rather accurately. If you don't want anybody guessing about what you feel, then please make your point directly instead of implying that I'm doing something underhanded.
Thanks,
Darell
Minjin said:
Darrel has spoken in the past of how he's able to charge up his million dollar EV at public charging stations for free. Now he's talking about selling that power back?? I call that double dipping.
[/ QUOTE ]
Mark - I'm still sorry that you think I'm such a "taker."
1. There is no way to extract the power from either of my EVs except to power the car. Whatever manages to get into the car is never sold. I'm hoping that one day that'll change, but that's how it is for now. And I don't want it to change so that I can steal and "double dip" I want it that way so I can help eliminate the need for more power plants. I use public charging when I need it so that I can avoid taking a gas car on longer trips. Again, I go through this extra hassle to *help* society, not to steal from it.
2. The $1 million pricetag for the EV1 is provided somewhat tongue-in-cheek. GM was free to set the MSRP on these wherever they wanted, and it was, if I remember correctly, $36,000. GM *claims* that the the entire EV1 program to produce 1000 cars cost them $1 billion. It was their choice not to amortize that (REALLY SMALL as compared to regular car develeopment monies) developement money over many, many more cars. If the $1 billion has been 100% absorbed in the fist 1000 cars, then the next ones off the line will cost about $20,000 to build. Bargain! Saaby will quickly tell you that 1$ billion is peanuts for new vehicle development. GM spends more than that on face-lifts for cars it has been selling for decades.
[ QUOTE ]
Its nice that Darrel and others have completely characterized me from a single line of text.
[/ QUOTE ]
Your statement at the top of this post would indicate that we characterized your comment rather accurately. If you don't want anybody guessing about what you feel, then please make your point directly instead of implying that I'm doing something underhanded.
Thanks,
Darell