Quark AA2 Turbo as bike lights?

No idea how they'd hold up to the vibrations and abuse, but in terms of beam quality, the Quark Turbo ought to be great as a bike light. I wouldn't worry about mixing a Turbo and a regular Quark, unless there's a feature of the regular UI you prefer. The Turbo beam has plenty of spill.
 
I've used my Fenix L1D (1x AA) on my bike several times and was very pleased. Much brighter than the normal light of my pal. The Fenix has a bit more spill, so I would not vote for the turbo head. But then again, that depends on your speed of travel. ;)

Ah, and get yourself one of the TwoFish "lockblocks":
http://www.batteryjunction.com/twofish-lockblocks.html
:)

(Much cheaper than for example the Fenix equivalent.)
 
Last edited:
AA Turbo is bit big for a bike light really with poor run time. The 123*2 Turbo I use occasionally with an L-mini II and MG PLI.

A 123*2 turbo is about the biggest I'd go for.
 
I have used an original L2D as a bike light for a long time. The Quark Tactical, with its higher output and larger hotspot, is a clear upgrade path for the Fenix. I would rather use two Tacticals than a Turbo and Regular. The only real difference is that the Turbo has a smaller, more concentrated and brighter hotspot, and honestly I find the wider hotspot of the Tactical to be more useful.
 
I've tested the Quark AA2 Regular. It's plenty of light and has a nice spill beam. I'm running the light with 2 x 2000 mAh Eneloop. These batteries rocks. Tested the light on max output in a freezer for 1 hour and still going strong. Just ordered the XX version of the Eneloop featuring 2500 mAh!!! Havn't tried the turbo, but the throw on the AA2 regular is adequate for a normal urban environment. Of course if you would like to light up the entire road out to 100m you should probably go for a different system, mounting a X10 on a bike, is probably overkill.
 
Top