I've been reading a lot of posts lately where the type of beam for "the perfect headlight" is in disagreement for a lot of headlight users. Unfortunately, there will probably never be a headlight that has the type of output that pleases everybody since almost everybody has a different intended use for one. I personally prefer a headlight that has some decent throw; and if I ever need it for more close-up applications I can always add a diffuser. But I am seeing more and more CPFers preferring a headlight that has more of a floody beam.
My idea is this (and it's primarily aimed at "close-up" headlight users): Why doesn't somebody produce a headlight that uses a "conical" reflector instead of a "parabolic" reflector? I've only seen one light produced that used this type of a reflector, and that was the original Photons International CR2 Ion. It used a conical reflector that produced a FANTASTIC beam profile for close-up applications! There was really no hotspot to speak of, and virtually no sidespill as well. What it produced was a very broad cone of light that was wide enough to compensate for the lack of true side-spill, and bright enough to compensate for the lack of a true hotspot. IMHO, it produced one of the most useful close-up beams I've ever seen, and I'm sorta suprised that no other lights that I'm aware of (especially headlights!) have used it since the Ion. IIRC, the biggest complaint about the Ion when it came out was that it didn't have enough throw, and everyone started either modding their CR2 Ions with parabolic reflectors and stronger emitters, or paying some pretty serious "jack" to buy already modded Ions! It's sorta funny how us flashoholics have "evolved"...when I frst joined CPF back in '02, everybody was wanting more TTTHHHRRROOOOOOOWWWWWWWW!!! Now it seems like more and more of us (myself included) are always seeking that perfect mix of throw AND flood, and find the perfect "flooder" to be far more useful for most applications than the perfect thrower.
I still prefer a headlight with decent throw because when I use my headlights outdoors I'm usually doing something that requires my sight to be further than just "arm's length". But when I do need a headlight for something that's a close range task, I find myself thinking a LOT about the beam that was produced by my CR2 Ion (...or should I say IonS, since I owned three of them). I think the beam produced by the Ion's conical reflector would work GREAT in a headlight designed for close-up applications, and I hope somebody will take this suggestion "under advisement" in the near future. Anybody care to comment?
PJD
My idea is this (and it's primarily aimed at "close-up" headlight users): Why doesn't somebody produce a headlight that uses a "conical" reflector instead of a "parabolic" reflector? I've only seen one light produced that used this type of a reflector, and that was the original Photons International CR2 Ion. It used a conical reflector that produced a FANTASTIC beam profile for close-up applications! There was really no hotspot to speak of, and virtually no sidespill as well. What it produced was a very broad cone of light that was wide enough to compensate for the lack of true side-spill, and bright enough to compensate for the lack of a true hotspot. IMHO, it produced one of the most useful close-up beams I've ever seen, and I'm sorta suprised that no other lights that I'm aware of (especially headlights!) have used it since the Ion. IIRC, the biggest complaint about the Ion when it came out was that it didn't have enough throw, and everyone started either modding their CR2 Ions with parabolic reflectors and stronger emitters, or paying some pretty serious "jack" to buy already modded Ions! It's sorta funny how us flashoholics have "evolved"...when I frst joined CPF back in '02, everybody was wanting more TTTHHHRRROOOOOOOWWWWWWWW!!! Now it seems like more and more of us (myself included) are always seeking that perfect mix of throw AND flood, and find the perfect "flooder" to be far more useful for most applications than the perfect thrower.
I still prefer a headlight with decent throw because when I use my headlights outdoors I'm usually doing something that requires my sight to be further than just "arm's length". But when I do need a headlight for something that's a close range task, I find myself thinking a LOT about the beam that was produced by my CR2 Ion (...or should I say IonS, since I owned three of them). I think the beam produced by the Ion's conical reflector would work GREAT in a headlight designed for close-up applications, and I hope somebody will take this suggestion "under advisement" in the near future. Anybody care to comment?
PJD