...
And about that TIR (total internal reflection) used in the E2DL - isn't that supposed to be better than a reflector? Or does it have disadvantages?
Hmm. Maybe I better just get an E2DL. After all, that will give me a good excuse to buy another light later, instead of just a new lamp, right? 😀 Man, this is starting to become a very expensive interest... :duh2: 🙁
Neither TIR nor reflectors are necessarily "better". In general, a reflector will give you a better beam time after time (from SF anyway). TIRs are a bit funny, and if they are just a touch off you can see splotchiness, rings, off-centered hotspots, and other anomalies. Actually, even if they are perfectly lined up there are often issues. Where the TIR really can excel though is THROW. This is the point of the E2DL, and to get that much throw with a reflector would mean a much larger head.
I have an E2DL, and on a white wall the beam doesn't look nearly as pretty as my U2. The hotspot is a bit off, and the spill isn't very smooth at all. However, when you take it outside, the imperfections disappear and all your left with is a great thrower.
The 6P/G2 is a great upgrade path, but you won't be able to upgrade immediately with SF parts. The reason why I suggested it is because in 2-3 years, when you're sick of the output, you can go to your local SF dealer and pick up the latest drop in and be up to date in terms of performance. However, while I don't own one, I have a feeling that a lot of people on this board would put their Malkoff head-to-head with any SF drop-in in terms of performance
and reliability. He also lets you choose output and beam profile, and from what I understand they are quite beautiful.
I love my E2DL though. It is more easily pocketed, which is why I went with it!