Solarforce T7 - Q5 Cree

selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
This new Solarforce T7 was kindly provided by CPF user waion at no charge for review. You can find more information on these at the supplier’s website: www.solarforce.hk.

UPDATE 1/25/08: They are now currently available for sale at Lighthound for ~$55.

T7-2-1.jpg


Features of Solarforce T7, according to the supplier and one eBay vendor (note that I do not have independent verification for most of these):
  • Cree Q5 LED
  • 2xCR123A lithium battery, 2x16340 (RCR) Li-ion rechargeable battery or 1x 17670 Li-ion rechargeable battery (note that my protected AW 17670 won't fit, so I used a lower capacity 14670 in my tests - 18650 will certainly NOT fit)
  • Aerospace grade aluminium 6061-T6 body with HA III coating
  • 7 output levels (note: my sample actually has 8 levels)
  • Max output 240 lumens
  • Digitally regulated for constant brightness (see my review for a discussion)
  • SOS & flashing modes available at each intensity level
  • Unique 3-button control system (see below for an explanation of the UI)
  • 4cm (Length) x 2.1cm (Diameter)
  • 56-gram weight (excluding batteries)
  • Waterproof to IPX-8 Standard.
  • Toughened ultra clear glass lens with AR coating.
  • Push-button tail cap switch
  • Capable of standing up securely on a flat surface to serve as a candle

What came in the package:

T7-1-1.jpg


T7-3-1.jpg


T7-5.jpg


Beamshots:

On Max with AW protected RCR (black-label). For comparison purposes, I’ve also included the Fenix P2D-Q5 and T1-Q5. For P3D-Q5 comparison, see post #2.

T7-8.jpg

T7-9.jpg

T7-10.jpg

T7-11.jpg


As you can see, the Solarforce T7 seems to be the brightest of bunch, with a similar profile to the Fenix Q5 head. Tint on the T7 isn’t as purple as it looks in the pics, although the Fenix lights are quite warm in comparison. I’d estimate WF tint on the T7 (common on Q5 Crees these days - and the same as my Fenix P3D Q5 which just arrived, shown in post #2).

Output:

For more detailed comparisons, please scroll down to the runtime charts below. Here are the results of a quick "ceiling-bounce" test in a small windowless room, with my light meter on the floor near the base of the light (which is shining upward in candle-mode). All are on max output on AW protected RCR except for VB-16 (18650).

Solarforce T7: 8.7 lux
Fenix P2D-Q5: 7.1 lux
Fenix T1: 8.1 lux
Fenix P3D-Q5: 8.1 lux
VB-16 ("4W" overdriven) modded with U-bin SSC: 6.2 lux

Output/Runtime Method: All my output numbers are relative for my home-made light box setup, a la Quickbeam's flashlightreviews.com method. My relative overall output numbers are typically similar to his, although generally a little lower. You can directly compare all my review graphs - i.e. an output value of "10" in one graph is the same as "10" in another.

Batteries used were Energizer primary CR123A, AW protected RCR (black-label, 750mAh), and AW protected 14670 Li-ion (1100mAh). My AW 17670 Protected Li-ion is too fat and won't to fit into the tube.

T7-1.gif


T7-2.gif


T7-3.gif


Summary Chart:

Throw values are the square-root of lux measurements taken at 1m using a light meter.

T7-4-1.gif


Digital Regulation:
  • I'm not sure how the Solarforce T7 regulates its output modes. I suspect it is likely current-controlled. If it uses PWM, the frequency is too high for me to detect by eye or by instrument.
  • Output is very nicely regulated at every level on primary CR123A and RCR.
  • On single-cell Li-ion (14670 in my case), output is only semi-regulated – but all 8 output levels are preserved.

T7-12.jpg


User Interface:
  • The light lacks a memory mode, and always comes on at max brightness
  • Light is turned on by the reverse clicky switch in the tailcap (note the tailcap threads are anodized, so you activate this light like a twisty if you want). Rear clicky is a bit stiff on my sample.
  • The light has 8 output modes, not 7 as claimed by the supplier
  • Press the lower red button once to decrease the output level by 1
  • Press the upper red button once to increase the output level by 1
  • Press and hold the upper red button for 2 sec to get into the flashing mode (or quickly press the tail switch twice - i.e. "flash" the tail switch)
  • Press and hold the lower red button for 2 sec to get into the SOS mode

T7-4.jpg


T7-13.jpg


T7-14.jpg


Build Quality
  • Overall build quality is fairly good. I don’t have a P3D Q5 to compare to (yet, it’s on order), but I would say build quality is close to the Fenix lights. UPDATE: the P3D Q5 has just arrived, and is certainly not as long (see post #2), but has a slightly more substantial feel to it than the Solarforce (i.e. a bit more "heft" to the P3D-Q5)
  • Hard Anodized (type III) finish is in good shape and unblemished on my sample. Lettering is also neat and clear for the most part.
  • The head doesn’t open, batteries are changed by unscrewing the tailcap.
  • Can't access the head, but the textured OP reflector looks to be aluminum.
  • Clicky switch retaining ring was gouged on my sample, likely due to snap-ring pliers slipping during assembly. Note the light would “wobble” when tail-standing as shipped, due to over-tightening of the retaining ring – slightly unscrewing it resolved the issue.
  • Rear reverse clicky switch is a bit stiff, and requires a fair amount of pressure to activate
  • Red up/down intensity switches have good tactile feel and auditory feedback when pressed (makes a soft clicking noise). This is an improvement over the first generation VB-16s, which were somewhat "squishy" (i.e. you could easily jump a couple of levels at once).

T7-2-1.jpg


Accessories
  • As you can see in the pics at the top of the page, the light comes in a box very similar in design to Fenix (even has the same description on the front!)
  • Solarforce includes a nice sewn-nylon carrying pouch with closing flap and belt attachment.
  • Extra o-ring, tailcap cover, and wrist lanyard included.

Conclusion:

Pros
  • Brightest Q5 light of its class. To give you a comparison, output of my Q5 Fenix T1/P3D are about one level down from max on the T7.
  • Well-built, worked reliably during testing. I would say overall build quality is close to the Fenix line.
  • Good user interface with 3-button setup, very familiar to fans of the VB-16.
  • Clever placement of SOS and strobe out of the way, but easy to access by holding down lower and upper red buttons (respectively)
  • Fully regulated on RCR and primaries, semi-regulated on single-cell Li-ion. Note that all output levels are maintained on all battery types, which is impressive :thumbsup:
  • Decent runtimes given the output.
  • Anodized tailcap threads, allowing for tailcap lock-out or use a rear “twisty”
Cons
  • No memory mode, light always starts on Max. :shrug: At the very least, I think people would want a forward clicky if it was always going to come on in Max. But a memory mode would be far more useful
  • Most of the 8 output levels are clustered near the higher end of output. The light could use a lower Min output level, and much more differentiation at the lower end of the output scale
  • Body tube is a bit tight: my blue-label AW protected RCRs wouldn’t fit (only black-label fit). Similarly, my AW protected 17670 Li-ion won't fit either (but in fairness, it won't fit in my Fenix P3D-Q5 either). Looks like 14670 is the way to go for maximum compatibility.
  • Rear reverse clicky switch is a bit stiff

Summary:
  • The only thing holding me back from giving this light a firm :twothumbs is no memory mode and the relative lack of lower output levels. Fans of the earlier VB-16s will be disappointed by this change, as it seems a step back from two of the main advantages of those lights.
  • The user interface is a good design, intuitive and simple to use - with smart placement of the SOS/strobe out of sight, but available at all output levels
  • Overall output is the highest for all my general use Cree Q5 lights (although this sample has a slight purple tint – likely a WF tint bin). The Q5 Fenix T1/P3D overall output is close - around level 7 on this light (out of 8 total).
  • Compared to my overdriven 1st gen VB-16 "4W" with U-bin SSC mod, the T7 is at least 35-40% brighter overall. I doubt current SSC VB-16s are much brighter than my modded one.
  • Price is reasonable at ~$55.

Cheers! :wave:
 
Last edited:
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
Wouldn't you know it: no sooner than I post the review, and my P3D Q5 shows up in the mail! :duh2:

T7-15.jpg


As you can see, the Solarforce T7 is much taller, closer the the 2AA Fenix L2D.

Beamshots on Max/Turbo:

T7-16.jpg

T7-17.jpg


The P3D Q5 has a slightly smoother beam, with less rings (likely due to the fact the emitter seems to be pulled back to just below the reflector on my sample). However, my P3D emitter is not perfectly centered, leading a slight shadow around the hospot (lower right in the pic above).

You'll note there's no real tint difference between the Solarforce T7 and my Fenix P3D Q5. I'd estimate both are WF tints.

Overal output of the P3D Q5 is exactly the same as my Fenix T1, so all the comparisons on the first post still apply.

More info to come ...
 
Last edited:
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
an odd light. But it's interesting, not the regular fare.
+1. It's certainly not your typical light - nice to see something different ...:whistle:

I only wish it had lower low modes and a memory feature like the old VB-16s. On the other hand, I wish Fenix could get its circuits working as well with single Li-ion cells.
 
PhantomPhoton

PhantomPhoton

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
3,116
Location
NV
Thanks for the review.
I am a big fan of 18650, so it's too bad that they aren't supported. I like 18650s on my VB-16.
I do like the ui of this light. I agree that having more low options would be better though.
Reverse clickie tailcap switch I assume?
 
adirondackdestroyer

adirondackdestroyer

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
2,018
Selfbuilt,

Another awesome review! Keep it up!

This light looks really nice, but to me the killer is the fact that it has no memory and can only be turned on in the highest setting. If they had a memory I'm sure ALOT more people would be interested in it.
 
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
I do like the ui of this light. I agree that having more low options would be better though.
Reverse clickie tailcap switch I assume?
That's what I get for rushing my review out yesterday - forgot to talk about the rear clicky! :ohgeez:

Yes, it is indeed a reverse clicky. One point I've just added to the main post is that a forward clicky would make more sense for a light with no memory mode that always came on max (i.e. make it "tactical").

As for the lack of 18650, at least it still maintains all its levels on a single 17670 Li-ion (something Fenix has yet to figure out). I have an AW protected 17670 on order, and will confirm that it fits (likely to be a tight squeeze). My 14670 is only a temporary solution for now, to demonstrate the feature.

This light looks really nice, but to me the killer is the fact that it has no memory and can only be turned on in the highest setting. If they had a memory I'm sure ALOT more people would be interested in it.

Agreed, that is the main limitation in my view as well (followed by the lack of low modes). Both of these features were present on the VB-16, so it seems a loss here. On the plus side, the up and down level switches work a lot better than the first generation VB-16s (just updated the review to point that out). No more wondering where you will end up - and a very clever placement for the SOS/strobe.

:wave:
 
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
Just added low mode on the T7 on 14670 to the first post.

Although the overall output on single Li-ion isn't that much lower on most levels, there is a considerable drop at the lowest level (which is a good thing, in my view). Still not as low as the lowest level of the P3D-Q5, though.

I'll get cracking on some runtimes for the P3D and add those to the second post. :)
 
Last edited:
J

jsr

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
1,901
Location
socal
It's an attractive light. A bit long for my taste (I prefer lights to be not much larger than the battery they use as if I were to go for something longer, I would like a larger battery to fit for longer runtime), but it seems well made. I like the rectangular knurling. Overall, the light looks very Fenix-like. Nice to see a mfr have enough fore-thought to make the tube fit 17670s, unlike similar offerings which have trouble fitting them limiting the user to R123As as the only rechargeable option.
 
W

waion

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
88
Location
Hong Kong
Thank you very much for the detailed review, which gives me and the other cpf fellows some very useful information such as the runtime, etc. Very informative indeed.

Just a few words to add: this is actual a new light independent of the VB-16s, which seems to me came to an end months ago when I sold out my 1st and the only run of the 4th gen VB-16 (with the SSC P4 leds) here in CPF.
 
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
Overall, the light looks very Fenix-like. Nice to see a mfr have enough fore-thought to make the tube fit 17670s, unlike similar offerings which have trouble fitting them limiting the user to R123As as the only rechargeable option.
I agree on the look ... unfortunately, my AW protected 17670 just arrived, and it won't fit in the T7. The battery is too fat (this is the new kind with the nipple on the positive terminal). :(

Note that this is not a problem unique to the T7 - the same battery won't fit in my Fenix P3D either. You might be able to squeeze it into the P3D if you remove the label, but I wouldn't chance it. There's certainly no way it will make into the T7, which is a hair's width narrower than the P3D.

Thank you very much for the detailed review, which gives me and the other cpf fellows some very useful information such as the runtime, etc. Very informative indeed.
My pleasure, I enjoyed working with this light. A slightly wider battery tube/body would be my last recommendation ...

Merry Christmas everyone! :party:
 
spoonrobot

spoonrobot

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
396
Very nice looking light. It's about time some of these features made their way around.

I've been waiting for a multi-level light that always activates on high and has a reverse clickie.
 
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
Very nice looking light. It's about time some of these features made their way around.

I've been waiting for a multi-level light that always activates on high and has a reverse clickie.
This could be a good light for you then. The clicky is a bit stiff, but that should help prevent accidental activation.

FYI, waion informs me he's looking to incorporate some of my suggestions into his next project - looking forward to it. :wave:
 
S

SEMIJim

Enlightened
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
344
Location
S.E. Michigan
Thanks for the detailed review, selfbuilt. Well done! :twothumbs:

I think if the manufacturer would address the nits (lack or memory or replace the reverse-clicky with a forward clicky, spread the brightness levels out some more and provide a really low low), this light would have real potential.

As it is: I think I'll just continue to regret missing out on Waion's last run of the VB-16 :mecry:, and see what he comes up with next.

Jim
 
spoonrobot

spoonrobot

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
396
I hope this light stays reverse clickie, it's a user interface that works better for pocket EDC than a forward clickie. Not all of us want to be tactical.
 
S

SEMIJim

Enlightened
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
344
Location
S.E. Michigan
I hope this light stays reverse clickie, it's a user interface that works better for pocket EDC than a forward clickie.
Except a 2xCR123 is a bit large for pocket EDC, anyway, wouldn't you say? Plus this one's long even for a 2xCR123.

Jim
 
spoonrobot

spoonrobot

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
396
Except a 2xCR123 is a bit large for pocket EDC, anyway, wouldn't you say? Plus this one's long even for a 2xCR123.

Jim

Not for me, my pants have extra deep pockets. :D

I find that length is much easier to carry than width. I EDC a D-Mini now and find the large diameter head disrupts the lines of my clothes more often and ends up causing my more discomfort than a slightly skinnier, but significantly longer light like the L2T I EDC on occasion.
 
spoonrobot

spoonrobot

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
396
Got mine today from an eBay seller. Turns out as I was waiting for the light to make the Air Mail trip lighthound begun stocking them. I'll have to order my next one from him.

After playing with this light for a few hours I've come to the conclusion that it drops the D-Mini from my EDC is a heartbeat. Two different beasts I know, but this light is a big improvement for carry and offers a much easier way to change light levels over other lights out there.

As stated above the levels are too close, there are too many of them and there aren't enough lows but if you like reverse clickies that always activate on high mode and have a wicked-easy UI then this light is for you.

:twothumbs

Also; two Panasonic batteries are included with the light. They state on the wrapper that they are Japanese manufacture, any input on whether this is true or not?
 
Last edited:
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
Thanks for the update spoonrobot, glad you enjoy the light.

I've just updated the first post with a link to the lighthound page where these are now for sale.
 
S

Shaocaholica

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
330
So how much brighter is the T7 compared to the current SSC VB-16? I really like the form factor of the VB-16 with 18650 capability but the lackluster SSC bugs me.
 

Similar threads

ernsanada
Replies
10
Views
10K
ernsanada
ernsanada
kosPap
Replies
3
Views
2K
kosPap
kosPap
M
Replies
26
Views
28K
Thor20003
T
Top