I have a L17 here. Its basically a MC13vn except not as impressive since it uses the Ws instead of the W.1s.
Also Acebeam doesnt tune the beam to perfection like Manker does.
I have the MC13 stock, MC13vn with W2.1, E10, and L17 and I can confirm what Vinh said is true. Despite they use the same optic, the MC13 beam is more fine tuned than the E07 and the MC13vn beam is more fine tuned than the L17. The Mankers have less artifact and the hotspot is more uniform.
Here are some measurements. Sorry I don't take throw measurements. My house is not big enough for this setup.
Manker MC13 | Low | 70 lumens | 6454K | 0.0042 DUV | 67.2 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -36.1 R9 | 36.7 R12 | 63 Rf | 95 Rg | included 18650 battery |
Manker MC13 | Mid | 145 lumens | 6974K | 0.0004 DUV | 67.5 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -27.5 R9 | 38.6 R12 | 62 Rf | 96 Rg | included 18650 battery |
Manker MC13 | High | 292 lumens | 7066K | -0.0006 DUV | 67.1 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -25.4 R9 | 39.7 R12 | 61 Rf | 97 Rg | included 18650 battery |
Manker MC13 | Turbo | 630 lumens | 8686K | -0.0078 DUV | 70.4 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -1.0 R9 | 43.5 R12 | 62 Rf | 98 Rg | included 18650 and 18350 battery |
Manker MC13vn w/ W2.1 | Low | 69 lumens | 6102K | 0.0012 DUV | 67.9 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -29.0 R9 | 36.2 R12 | 63 Rf | 96 Rg | included 18350 battery |
Manker MC13vn w/ W2.1 | Mid | 174 lumens | 6443K | -0.0016 DUV | 68.0 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -23.1 R9 | 37.5 R12 | 62 Rf | 96 Rg | included 18350 battery |
Manker MC13vn w/ W2.1 | High | 391 lumens | 6897K | -0.0052 DUV | 68.4 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -14.1 R9 | 39.2 R12 | 60 Rf | 98 Rg | included 18350 battery |
Manker MC13vn w/ W2.1 | Turbo | 1,000 lumens | 7506K | -0.0089 DUV | 70.1 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -1.7 R9 | 41.8 R12 | 61 Rf | 98 Rg | included 18350 battery |
Acebeam L17 | Turbo | 1,141 lumens | 7110K | -0.0042 DUV | 70.7 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -12.6 R9 | 42.2 R12 | 64 Rf | 96 Rg | VTC5D |
Acebeam L17 | High | 293 lumens | 6200K | 0.0037 DUV | 66.9 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -36.9 R9 | 36.3 R12 | 63 Rf | 95 Rg | VTC5D |
Acebeam L17 | Mid | 131 lumens | 6012K | 0.0056 DUV | 67.0 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -39.9 R9 | 34.9 R12 | 64 Rf | 94 Rg | VTC5D |
Acebeam L17 | Low | 40 lumens | 5769K | 0.0081 DUV | 66.9 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -45.0 R9 | 33.0 R12 | 65 Rf | 93 Rg | VTC5D |
Acebeam L17 | Moonlight | 9 lumens | 5403K | 0.0109 DUV | 66.5 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -49.2 R9 | 31.2 R12 | 66 Rf | 92 Rg | VTC5D |
Acebeam E10 | Turbo | 562 lumens | 7088K | -0.0068 DUV | 65.9 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -15.0 R9 | 39.9 R12 | 56 Rf | 99 Rg | included battery |
Acebeam E10 | High | 222 lumens | 6695K | -0.0031 DUV | 65.1 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -26.0 R9 | 37.9 R12 | 57 Rf | 98 Rg | included battery |
Acebeam E10 | Mid | 103 lumens | 6510K | -0.0007 DUV | 65.1 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -31.1 R9 | 37.1 R12 | 58 Rf | 97 Rg | included battery |
Acebeam E10 | Low | 12 lumens | 6089K | 0.0030 DUV | 65.6 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -37.5 R9 | 35.5 R12 | 61 Rf | 96 Rg | included battery |
Acebeam E10 | Moonlight | 0 lumens | 5534K | 0.0034 DUV | 67.1 CRI | Blue light relative amplitude 1.00 | -31.0 R9 | 36.2 R12 | 63 Rf | 97 Rg | included battery |
Strangely the MC13vn does better with the included 18350 vs 18650. With 18650, it measures 970 lumens on turbo instead of 1,000 and that is the highest I got after trying many different 18650 cells including Manker 18650, VTC6, VTC5D, P26A, NCR18650GA, and protected and unprotected versions. I'm wondering if the 18650 tube is too long and the springs are not long enough to provide enough contact pressure. However even with the long protected cells, it still makes less lumen than the included 18350.