Ultrafire Clones power compare to Zebralights ?

[bulbhead]

I'm searching more informations on Ultrafire séries UF-Hx.
On descriptions, H2 and H3 are both same lumens, is it real ? ​

H3 is given for 230lumens max, after reading some reviews it seems wrong, they are more likely near 80-

​

​

​

100lumens as the zebralight H30 and H50 series, is it right ?

For the H2 the review was made with an AA instead 14500, does it make real difference in lumens ?

Read too that H1 and H3 would have same driver (think so H2 too) ?
Does someone have an adress to compare the beamshot of the zebralight and the ultrafire clones ?
Thanks ​

 

[mfm]

For the H2 the review was made with an AA instead 14500, does it make real difference in lumens ?

On KD it is listed as 14500 ONLY so it probably makes a lot of difference.

 

[bulbhead]

on all other website it can support AA or 14500
constructor too http://www.ultrafire.net/product.asp.
on another website he said H1 is a little more bright as H30 but H3 is as bright as H1.

 

[mfm]

on all other website it can support AA or 14500
constructor too http://www.ultrafire.net/product.asp.
on another website he said H1 is a little more bright as H30 but H3 is as bright as H1.

It obviously works with "AA" as you said there was a review, but it is probably quite dim with them and that's why KD doesn't think its worth bothering with it without 14500 cells. Just like the Akoray K-106.

 

[bulbhead]

I rewrite the link for test to refresh
http://www.taschenlampen-test.de/videoreview/aa_batteries/test-zebralight-h60-vs-ultrafire-h2

It's interesting idea if H2 works better with 14500 in term of brightness. To think that H3 Cree XR-E Q5 LED, Max 230Lumens working with 18650 is not brighter than a H1 Cree XR-E Q3 LED, Max 60Lumens makes feel a little sad :sigh: