phantom23 Flashlight Enthusiast Joined Nov 3, 2007 Messages 2,044 Aug 15, 2011 #1 Has anyone compared classic XP-E with new XP-E HEW? Is it true that the new one is more floody? Some say it is, some say it isn't.
Has anyone compared classic XP-E with new XP-E HEW? Is it true that the new one is more floody? Some say it is, some say it isn't.
foxtrot824 Enlightened CPF Supporter Joined Sep 24, 2008 Messages 649 City & State/Province Boston Aug 19, 2011 #2 I have found it to be a little more floody around the edges as well as some funny color separation when using a Carclo optic. I have built seven XP triples and the original XP-E was pretty tight. http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb...Lux-RC-all-in-the-comfort-of-an-e-series-head
I have found it to be a little more floody around the edges as well as some funny color separation when using a Carclo optic. I have built seven XP triples and the original XP-E was pretty tight. http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb...Lux-RC-all-in-the-comfort-of-an-e-series-head
vaska Newly Enlightened Joined Feb 18, 2010 Messages 96 City & State/Province Moscow, Russia Aug 19, 2011 #3 Here you are.
phantom23 Flashlight Enthusiast Joined Nov 3, 2007 Messages 2,044 Aug 22, 2011 #4 Almost as bright (or even brighter) than XP-G at the same current. Nice but I'm a little bit dissapointed with colors while using optics. Is there the same problem with classic reflector?
Almost as bright (or even brighter) than XP-G at the same current. Nice but I'm a little bit dissapointed with colors while using optics. Is there the same problem with classic reflector?