Recycling Light Technology (RLT) Flashlight - The future?

seven11

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
113
Location
Ohio
Has anyone had any experience with Recycling Light Technology? It claims to boost the output of an LED by 40% and it's a passive system, so there are no moving parts and requires no alteration to the LED itself. A company called Wavien has a prototype light for sale on their website but its out of my price range. Has anyone ever seen one of these used at a trade show? If the claims about it are true, it could completely change the game on what is possible in terms of throw.
 

tolkaze

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 26, 2009
Messages
569
Location
Muswellbrook
From what I have read of both technologies, the LRT only increases surface brightness by reflecting light back onto the die of the LED. This of course makes the die increase in both brightness and probably heat too. When the light is then passed through an optic it is brighter by 40% compared to just an optic (like an aspheric) if you were to measure the LRT output and a good TIR optic in an integrating sphere, the light outputs would be very much the same OTF since the LRT doesn't allow wasted light to soak into the black space between the LED and the Aspheric. Similarly, a TIR (or even a reflector) can get most of the light out the front relatively efficiently.

The DEFT works better still. Instead of reflecting light back onto itself, which in my opinion only collects the scatter and puts it back onto itself, the DEFT pre-collimates the light and then sends it through an aspheric. This is much more efficient for a throwing style light.


Basic run down for throwers.

Reflector: reflects light from the LED out the front. Any light not collected by the reflector is spill light, which while it can throw relatively good, any spill light is not thrown forward, and considered lost. Small die LED's work good with all reflectors, Large LED's require larger reflectors to throw at all.

Aspheric: focuses light through an optic and collimates the beam so it is all throw. The light escaping from the LED to the sides, usually gets soaked up in the head of the light between the LED and the lens.

Reflex: Has the LED on the front glass facing backwards into the reflector. Less spill, and more throw than a reflector, more efficient than aspheric, but limited due to cooling of the LED

TIR: Total Internal Reflection... or something. Basically, all light reflects, refracts within the optic, and pushed out the front. Much tighter beams can be achieved than reflectors, with much less light lost as spill or soaked into the optic itself.

LRT: As mentioned above, creates higher surface brightness, can be coupled with aspheric, less loss as spill, but light still lost between die and lens. Higher surface brightness also probably means much higher temperatures at the LED, so better have very good heatsink. I don't think this is as good as TIR or reflector for total light output, but would be better than straight aspheric lens

DEFT: pre-collimates light before sending light through aspheric. Not sure exactly how it works, but is better than LRT and straight aspheric. From beamshots... is all throw and pretty much nothing else.
 

seven11

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
113
Location
Ohio
You really think a pre-collimater would do better than LRT in a head to head shootout, everything else being equal?
 
Top