I'm really glad this thread was created; I've been wondering about this myself. I am red-green colorblind, and for me the best solution has always been an incan.
As a way to gauge my color blindness against other people's; in a dimly lit room, i have to do a taste test between guacamole and salsa to identify them as such.
Cool white CFLs definitely hurt my eyes, but cool white leds are no problem. In use, i find that cool white leds make blues look vibrant, yellows are pretty accurate, but greens look muddy. It is also very difficult for me to identify something as red unless i already know that its red from previous experience.
I needed longer runtime, so i bought a Nichia 219 dropin from nailbender. For me, the quality of light the led produced left a bit to be desired. While it was able to better render the color red, it altered the hue of reds that were known to me. In other words, the same red color looked very different under incan light and the 219 light. Other colors were rendered pretty well, but i found the light itself to be kind of dull.
After taking some time to decide that i didn't particularly like the 219, i ordered a high cri xml dropin from Nailbender. That led pretty much hits the nail on the head. I was unable to distinguish a difference in color temperature between it and an LF E04 dropin. It also renders red the same way as an incan.
For me, the benefit of the high cri xml over incan is the efficiency and lumen increase. If i need to look for or find something, and it will take me awhile to do it, i grab the high cri xml. If i need to clear rooms, i grab my over driven xml cause it puts out a lot more light.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2