With a 600 high and 5 lumens low, I start to think they should really include a medium mode..
$235 for a light?
I think I will stick with my Fenix light!
5-80-600 would do it for meYep.
5/600 is ridiculous mode spacing. My preference would be about 40-50 lumens for "low", like the beloved LX2.
That way low would be general purpose, with high there as needed.
That depends on the electronics, heatsink and batteries that are been used.What does 600 lumen per ANSI standard mean these days in straight talk? Are we getting 600 lumens for 2 hours or 600 lumens for 2 minutes?
What does 600 lumen per ANSI standard mean these days in straight talk? Are we getting 600 lumens for 2 hours or 600 lumens for 2 minutes?
As the ANSI/NEMA FL-1 Standards are a copyrighted and protected document, I was initially relying on published public reports by various manufacturers on the standards' specifics. It turns out these weren't quite entirely accurate for max output. I have since purchased a copy of the FL-1 standards, and can confirm that all output/throw testing does takes place within 30-120 secs after activation. As you might imagine, manufacturers will typically pick the time that best suits them (likely 30 secs for output/throw measures).
** Runtime (at highest setting for multiple-output
lights) until output drops below 50 lumens.
In this case I was referring to SF claims not in general.That depends on the electronics, heatsink and batteries that are been used.
In this case I was referring to SF claims not in general.
I'm only aware of 3 brands that give you straight no BS lumen:runtime claims Zebralight, Malkoff and HDS. With most other brands you have to guess howy man true sustained lumens you'll get. It irks me to read topics about new lights that guys rave about only to find out that a light with the latest and greatest LED runs 1000 lumens for a minute and then drops to 350. At least advertise it accurately so I can decide if upgrades to my current lights make sense.