[ QUOTE ]
Sub_Umbra said:
...As I've said before, I'd buy a nice, HD, arched lanyard attachment that used the existing belt clip holes if it would accept any lanyard that would directly fit through the hole of the ARC AAA -- as IMO that is about the smallest hole that will accept a REAL lanyard without some Mickey Mouse split ring or flimsy dental floss contrivance. I don't think that there would be a problem fitting a sheath...
[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
markbUK said:
the phone loop (dental floss!) works just fine, I'm also in the process of having a brass version of the attachment your on about made, but i have a feeling the dental floss aproach gives a lower profile attachment,
[/ QUOTE ]
Emphasis mine.
Been there, done that. Good luck with the dental floss. The profile will even be lower yet if you lose your light! I would hope that if the worst case happens and you do lose your light you will not be participating in some activity where the loss of your light kills you. That is a real factor which must be considered for some users.
If you don't do things where the loss of your light could be fatal, fine, you may not need a REAL lanyard. If losing your light would be the only consequence of breaking your lanyard and you are prepared to absorb the replacement cost and hassle -- whatever.
A lanyard hole the size of the one on an ARC AAA will not prevent anyone from using a dental floss lanyard (or a split ring) with it if they wish, but if the hole is too small this fine light will be automatically ruled out for many serious tasks for that reason alone. This light was never designed for the average user and they don't buy lights like this. They make fine desk toys but I don't think that's all that Henry had in mind for them. Ironically, a great light in this class without an attachment point for a REAL lanyard will tend to limit its demographic by disqualifying it for those who need a heavy-duty light for the most demanding of situations.
Let's cover just one more thing. Please set me straight if I'm wrong on this, but am I correct in assuming that most who are using a lanyard with their EDCs are attaching it to the hole created by 'expanding' the metal at the end of the belt clip? Aside from some of the very serious design flaws of the dental floss lanyard in general which haven't even been mentioned here yet, has anyone noticed that this hole on the clip looks exactly like the blades on a pair of scissors -- right where they come in contact with each other and do the cutting? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
In the unlikely event that I ever changed my mind and decided to use a dental floss lanyard, in spite of all of its flaws, I would never attach it to a hole that has four spots build into it that look just like the business end of a pair of scissors.
Having said that, bear in mind that I am a great fan of this terrific light and any comments which I make about it that may appear negative have mainly been stated so that any potential EDC buyer who needs a REAL lanyard will be able to search the CPF database and more easily determine whether or not this light will meet his needs.
I wouldn't give up mine for anything and I am confident that either Henry or some third party will offer a high quality lanyard solution for those who require it.