Patents are becoming quite insane...
Anyone think that
US Patent #6,360,693 for a STICK would be denied based on prior art?
[ QUOTE ]
United States Patent 6,360,693
Long, III March 26, 2002
Animal toy
Abstract
An apparatus for use as a toy by an animal, for example a dog, to either fetch carry or chew includes a main section with
at least one protrusion extending therefrom that resembles a branch in appearance. The toy is formed of any of a number of materials including rubber, plastic, or
wood including wood composites and is solid. It is either rigid or flexible. A flavoring (scent) is added, if desired. The toy is adapted to float by including a material therein that is lighter than water or it is adapted to glow in the dark, as desired, by the addition of a fluorescent material that is either included in the material from which the toy is made or the flourescent material is applied thereto as a coating. The toy may be segmented (i.e., notched) so as to break off into smaller segments, as is useful for smaller animals or, alternatively, to extend the life of the toy. Various textured surfaces including camouflage colorings are anticipated as are straight or curved main sections. The toy may be formed of any desired material, as described, so as to be edible by the animal.
Inventors: Long, III; Ross Eugene (4732 Reinhardt Dr., Oakland, CA 94619)
Appl. No.: 454229
Filed: December 2, 1999
[/ QUOTE ]
-Bill