I have probably seen something close to 100% of the conversion (sealed beam shape/size) headlamps Cibie has produced over the years, and I am quite sure I have never seen one that is both "Euro Code" (ECE) and marked "Motorcycle". The requirement in FMVSS 108 that headlamps conforming to SAE J584 (motorcycle headlamps) and not using a replaceable light source type approved for use in cars and trucks, must have the word "Motorcycle" permanently marked on the lens in letters at least 3mm tall did not take effect until late 1990 -- which was probably done because the HB2 (US version of H4) was nearing approval and NHTSA did not want H4 motorcycle headlamps being confused for HB2 car/truck units. No lamps from anyone were so marked before that date, as far as I can recall. No Cibie conversion lamps were designed or redesigned after that date, as far as I can recall. I think you might be mis-remembering. There were Cibie H4 conversion lamps designed in the 1970s and '80s marked "SAE M" with a year code, signifying compliance with SAE J584 (motorcycle headlamp).
Backup lamp options
- Thread starter nozoxon
- Start date
Help Support Candle Power Flashlight Forum
- Status
I have probably seen something close to 100% of the conversion (sealed beam shape/size) headlamps Cibie has produced over the years, and I am quite sure I have never seen one that is both "Euro Code" (ECE) and marked "Motorcycle". The requirement in FMVSS 108 that headlamps conforming to SAE J584 (motorcycle headlamps) and not using a replaceable light source type approved for use in cars and trucks, must have the word "Motorcycle" permanently marked on the lens in letters at least 3mm tall did not take effect until late 1990 -- which was probably done because the HB2 (US version of H4) was nearing approval and NHTSA did not want H4 motorcycle headlamps being confused for HB2 car/truck units. No lamps from anyone were so marked before that date, as far as I can recall. No Cibie conversion lamps were designed or redesigned after that date, as far as I can recall. I think you might be mis-remembering. There were Cibie H4 conversion lamps designed in the 1970s and '80s marked "SAE M" with a year code, signifying compliance with SAE J584 (motorcycle headlamp).
It wasn't just Country Squire wagons, it was a wide range of automatic Ford products made in the mid-late '70s. The problem was sloppy design. There were deaths and injuries and a lot of property damage. The recall "solution" was a dashboard sticker reminding the driver to use the parking brake. Which I think shows how much Ford and NHTSA really cared about safety.
budynabuick
Enlightened
Last edited:
Honestly whichever way works for you, but **** happens. I'd wager that most people here didn't start with brand new E-class Mercedes as their first car. Mechanical failures and human error can happen to anyone, and I've had plenty of temperamental carburetors (and rebuilt a couple of them).
I can give you many examples of mechanical failure and human error (or even poor design) both by myself and many others, including people who died, because the brakes weren't on or the vehicle fell out of park (or didn't make it into park)--even in brand new vehicles.
I won't criticize, whichever works for you. Personally, from my experiences, I'd rather be on the hook to replace a $4 bulb than replacing my wife.
Hamilton Felix
Enlightened
Memory is admittedly hazy. And I probably misused that "Euro Code" descriptor. For a while, some folks tended to use the method to describe the nice pattern we saw from the imported H4 lights, the sharp low beam cutoff, horizontal to center, then 15 degree rise to the right. I don't even recall if the lights were marked ECE. I may still have some in the shed, so I should look.
Now you've made me curious. I think I'll see if I have any of my old headlights (I hate to throw away a cracked light, on the chance I might make it into a spotlight or manage to take it apart at match it to another lens someday), just to see if I can find that "M" marking on any of them.
But I wasn't talking about glass markings. I meant that sellers or importers added stickers saying "motorcycle" or "motorcycle use only." I think it was a legal ploy during a time that the lights were not approved for automobiles in America, but it was legal to import or sell them as motorcycle replacement headlights. Seems to me that somewhere around 1979 or so, Washington, Oregon and Massachusetts approved the H4 lights I'd already been using for some time. I'm not sure the feds ever did. I think the old fed "sealed" standard led to the Cibie Bobi and then eventually evolved to the various bulbs with O-ring seals, 9004, 9005, 9006, 9007, etc.
That's interesting about the permanent marking in 3mm letters requirement. But that's much later than I recall buying lights with the "motorcycle" stickers on the packages. I think it was just another ploy. Heck, I recall buying some 150 watt sealed beam spots with clear convex lens, in boxes with the Simmons brand (same as the rifle scopes and binoculars) from Sportsman's Guide on sale. They had a sticker on the back of each bulb that said "no use for automotive headlamp" but they had exactly the same mounting lugs as a 5-3/4" high beam, exactly the same slip-on connector and even exactly the same three raised "DOT aiming" bumps for a spirit level aimer. I want to say this was in the late 1980's or early 1990's. (No I never used them in high beams, but they were decent spotlights. I think I still have two or three in the shed). Can't imagine stock auto wiring beginning to carry those 150 watt lamps, but I'm sure some fools tried...
My Raybrig R118's arrived. I'll try to get the swapped into the Corolla this weekend. Maybe I will pick up an ordinary new 921, just to compare.
Hamilton Felix
Enlightened
Oops, duplicate/double post.
Last edited:
Hamilton Felix
Enlightened
Speaking of insane starting (a guy with a username of budynabuick may know this), Dad's 1953 Buick Super V8 Hardtop with Dynaflow transmission, started by turning the key on in Park and pushing the accelerator hard to the floor. There was a switch under the gas pedal. I've no idea what idiot at GM thought full throttle starts of cold engines was a good thing, but I don't think it lasted long.
I'm still lobbying for auxiliary backup lamps, but I haven't had time to install any lately.
The 796 bulb replaces the 1156, making more light at the same wattage by going to halogen. Is there a similar halogen upgrade for the 3156?
I'm still lobbying for auxiliary backup lamps, but I haven't had time to install any lately.
The 796 bulb replaces the 1156, making more light at the same wattage by going to halogen. Is there a similar halogen upgrade for the 3156?
Ah, stickers. Yes, those were applied by most of the US importers of ECE headlamps, and said something to the effect of "This headlamp conforms in full to all applicable provisions for headlamps on any vehicle in Canada. In the USA, this headlamp conforms in full to all applicable provisions of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 108 for use only on motorcycles." Which wasn't a lie; most of the lamps in question did meet SAE J584 and were lens-marked as such. The stickers were an effort at showing good faith effort to properly declare and import only legal equipment (i.e., so as not to get their inbound shipments seized and destroyed), or it was a wink-wink, nudge-nudge kind of deal...depending on your perspective!
Maybe it was more a hot-start thing, so the throttle was properly positioned wide open to clear out the flooded engine that resulted from hot-soaking on a summer's day followed by a nice full stroke of the accelerator pump before the starter switch closed. Come to think of it, though, on cold starts...how do you have both a choke unloader to clear a flooded engine and full closure of the choke blade when cold for a quick start from cold? Talk about an answer to a question nobody asked...
I wish there were, I could use it on my own cars. As far as I am aware, all you can get are the too-risky 50w items on the 3156 base.
Hamilton Felix
Enlightened
I'll have to ask Dad what else he remembers about that Buick. I think it was the first year they went to V8 from straight 8. Engine compartment was long, battery was 12v but weird long, thin one with two cells, then two cells, then two cells.
It must have jerked the choke open as soon as it fired and revved up, even if the driver was quick to pull his foot off the pedal. Along with thermal cycling, one of the worst sources of engine wear is spinning before oil pressure is up. And, though those transmissions were arranged PNDLR, imagine the liability today if a bad switch let you fire it up in gear - at full throttle.
I agree, I'm disappointed there's no same-wattage halogen option for the 3156. I'm not going to melt my backup lights with the 50W or 55W items. I think some of those are just cheap H3 bulbs hi-temp glued into a 3156 base.
Guess I need to make time to install my receiver hitch, then mount extra backup lights on that. I've already run a pair of (two wire, running ground you know) power circuits to the rear. The big trailer's battery charging and running/signal/backup lights had best not be added to the car's lighting load; I don't think the Ford LCM would like that.
Life was simpler before electronic control modules that keep track of lighting loads. Aux backups need their own circuits.
I still wonder about front corner backups like I had on the old Saab.
It must have jerked the choke open as soon as it fired and revved up, even if the driver was quick to pull his foot off the pedal. Along with thermal cycling, one of the worst sources of engine wear is spinning before oil pressure is up. And, though those transmissions were arranged PNDLR, imagine the liability today if a bad switch let you fire it up in gear - at full throttle.
I agree, I'm disappointed there's no same-wattage halogen option for the 3156. I'm not going to melt my backup lights with the 50W or 55W items. I think some of those are just cheap H3 bulbs hi-temp glued into a 3156 base.
Guess I need to make time to install my receiver hitch, then mount extra backup lights on that. I've already run a pair of (two wire, running ground you know) power circuits to the rear. The big trailer's battery charging and running/signal/backup lights had best not be added to the car's lighting load; I don't think the Ford LCM would like that.
Life was simpler before electronic control modules that keep track of lighting loads. Aux backups need their own circuits.
I still wonder about front corner backups like I had on the old Saab.
Last edited:
Hamilton Felix
Enlightened
Well, interesting:
I stopped at a parts store, wanting a fresh 921 bulb for comparison. I found a red two-pack of Sylvania 921LL, the Long Life version. Markings on the card say 12.8v 17.9w.
Amongst all the Japanese writing on the Raybrig R118 blister pack cards, is a large 12V 18W marking.
I popped the new 921LL into the right side backup light, then turned the key on in reverse. To my eyes, they either match or perhaps the original bulb is a hair brighter than the new 921LL They are pretty close, and not much different in regard to "yellow vs white."
So I went ahead and pulled the 821LL and popped in a Raybrig R118 on the right side. To my eyes, the Raybrig seems both "whiter" (higher color temperature) and somewhat brighter. Interestingly, when I showed the phone camera picture to my wife, on the Android's small screen, she didn't really think the right side light was brighter. So much for subjective observation. I REALLY wish I had a light meter to take some measurements. Heck, the 35MM SLR's of a few years back had meters built in. See what you think. All I can say is the R118 seems brighter. Was it worth nearly 20 bucks (shipping was more than the cost of the bulbs)? I don't know. It's clear that if I really want to see more behind the car I'll need to add auxiliary back lights.
I stopped at a parts store, wanting a fresh 921 bulb for comparison. I found a red two-pack of Sylvania 921LL, the Long Life version. Markings on the card say 12.8v 17.9w.
Amongst all the Japanese writing on the Raybrig R118 blister pack cards, is a large 12V 18W marking.
I popped the new 921LL into the right side backup light, then turned the key on in reverse. To my eyes, they either match or perhaps the original bulb is a hair brighter than the new 921LL They are pretty close, and not much different in regard to "yellow vs white."
So I went ahead and pulled the 821LL and popped in a Raybrig R118 on the right side. To my eyes, the Raybrig seems both "whiter" (higher color temperature) and somewhat brighter. Interestingly, when I showed the phone camera picture to my wife, on the Android's small screen, she didn't really think the right side light was brighter. So much for subjective observation. I REALLY wish I had a light meter to take some measurements. Heck, the 35MM SLR's of a few years back had meters built in. See what you think. All I can say is the R118 seems brighter. Was it worth nearly 20 bucks (shipping was more than the cost of the bulbs)? I don't know. It's clear that if I really want to see more behind the car I'll need to add auxiliary back lights.
Hamilton Felix
Enlightened
DARN. My first attempt at posting images. Guess I did it wrong. Two attempts to "edit," after I saw that the images didn't make it, and it freezes instead of letting me edit my post. Well, sorry about the images not being there. Guess until I figure this out, you'll have to just take my word. :shrug:
Alaric Darconville
Flashlight Enthusiast
Give it time, it'll load. It looks like you embedded the MIME encoding for the .JPGs in the message.
The preferred method is to upload the file to your host, then use VBBCode to post a link to the image, like
[img]http://www.colonslash.org/special/386enhmode.jpg[/img]
I used the 'noparse' tags to write the line above
It should result in:
Also: I just started a reply to that post in Firefox-- the editor opens so much faster there. Not trying to convert you to permanent Firefox usage, just suggesting it as an expedient method to clean out that previous post.
In the meantime, I've hosted the pics for everyone's enjoyment (I'll take 'em down once you get them hosted elsewhere, I s'pose) and posted scaled/cropped versions:
Originals in same location, named pic1.jpg and pic2.jpg.
The preferred method is to upload the file to your host, then use VBBCode to post a link to the image, like
[img]http://www.colonslash.org/special/386enhmode.jpg[/img]
I used the 'noparse' tags to write the line above
It should result in:
Also: I just started a reply to that post in Firefox-- the editor opens so much faster there. Not trying to convert you to permanent Firefox usage, just suggesting it as an expedient method to clean out that previous post.
In the meantime, I've hosted the pics for everyone's enjoyment (I'll take 'em down once you get them hosted elsewhere, I s'pose) and posted scaled/cropped versions:
Originals in same location, named pic1.jpg and pic2.jpg.
Last edited:
Alaric Darconville
Flashlight Enthusiast
budynabuick
Enlightened
LOL! Yes I am very familiar with this set-up. My screen name comes from the combo of my old best friend (now deceased) dog named buddy and I own a 63 Buick special deluxe (all stainless molding) with the v8 all aluminum with the dynaflow trans hence "budynabuick". BTW, It is a N. Carolina car with no rust purchased new by my now deceased dad. I hauled it up to Mi. and with a little, well a lot of tlc it now runs and looks great.
Keith, AKA budynabuick PS. I used to own a couple (55 buick 48 dodge) gas peddle start. the good old days
Last edited:
Hamilton Felix
Enlightened
I didn't mind the pedal start we had on our 48 and 52 Dodge pickups, as well as many early 50's GM's. But it was a separate pedal. Your right foot served as the starter solenoid. I'm leery of the gas pedal starter switch.
I recall adding backup lights to a few of our rigs, too. On the 52 Dodge heavy half ton, I made up rear lights that included a pair of PAR36 tractor floods, the put a push-pull switch with indicator light on the shifter. It was in the same please as the two speed axle switch and many medium trucks. Worked great.
I forget now if it was the 56 International or the 48 Ford stock truck that needed rear lighting, so I swiped a headlight bucket from our "retired" 49 International truck and simply installed a 7" headlight on the back on a dash toggle switch.
Gotta learn image posting here.
So I can't just upload from my PC?
I need to "host" it somewhere on the web, then put that URL into my post?
I'm still thinking about my old Saab. Scheinwerfermann, do you have any idea of there's a legal reason one could not have backup lights on the front corners of just about any car? I suppose they'd haveto meet the lighting standard same as the ones on the back, but it's not a super strict standard.
I recall adding backup lights to a few of our rigs, too. On the 52 Dodge heavy half ton, I made up rear lights that included a pair of PAR36 tractor floods, the put a push-pull switch with indicator light on the shifter. It was in the same please as the two speed axle switch and many medium trucks. Worked great.
I forget now if it was the 56 International or the 48 Ford stock truck that needed rear lighting, so I swiped a headlight bucket from our "retired" 49 International truck and simply installed a 7" headlight on the back on a dash toggle switch.
Gotta learn image posting here.
So I can't just upload from my PC?
I need to "host" it somewhere on the web, then put that URL into my post?
I'm still thinking about my old Saab. Scheinwerfermann, do you have any idea of there's a legal reason one could not have backup lights on the front corners of just about any car? I suppose they'd haveto meet the lighting standard same as the ones on the back, but it's not a super strict standard.
Yes. If you don't have personal webspace, you can use one of the photo hosting services such as Photobucket or Flickr or the like.
None. Auxiliary reversing lamps are permitted. Some Corvettes have them, too, though they're on the rear sides rather than the front sides if I recall correctly.
Actually, I think those Saab lamps you're talking about (and the Corvette items I have in mind) conform to the cornering lamp standards, SAE J852 (front) and J1373 (rear). These have tight control of upward (glare) light. J852 has 500cd max at the horizon, 400 max 1° up, 300 max 2° up, 200 max 3° up, and 125 max from 10° up to 90° up. At 2.5° down, the minimum is 300 or 500 cd depending on horizontal angle. So they want those lamps putting light on the road surface, not up in the air or far away. Mount height is 30 to 76 cm from road surface to optical axis of the lamp. For the rear cornering lamps, the minimum requirement at 2.5°D is 40 or 80 cd depending on horizontal angle, and the limit at horizontal and above is 500 cd. Also, "The rear cornering lamps should be illuminated only when the ignition switch is energized and reverse gear is engaged".
You could meet the intent (and very probably the letter) of the front and rear cornering, i.e., aux reverse lamps, with a fog lamp equipped with a low-wattage bulb. That would practically limit your choice to a fog lamp that takes an H3 bulb, because you can get 35w H3 bulbs, and even 27w H3 bulbs.
Hamilton Felix
Enlightened
Wow. Moving as I do in motorcycle circles from time to time, I knew about 35 watt H3 bulbs, but 27W is a new one on me. Good to know those options exist. I recall looking unsuccessfully for 35W H2 bulbs a while ago.
Backing up, I think light to the sides is almost as important as light straight back. After all, we don't always move straight backward. Also, when I had my little parking lot misadventure a year ago (it was early February 2011), I was moving very slowly backward out of my space in a dark parking lot, while the car I encountered came from my right. I was looking over my right shoulder, had to have been looking right at her. She had a dark car and was too busy lighting a cigarette to turn on headlights or even pay attention to surroundings. My ex-cop Crown Vic does have tinted windows. I think really good backup lights that threw light to the sides would have let me see the car as she drove behind me.
Front end design will make that "front backup" option more feasible for some than others, but it's always worth considering.
Backing up, I think light to the sides is almost as important as light straight back. After all, we don't always move straight backward. Also, when I had my little parking lot misadventure a year ago (it was early February 2011), I was moving very slowly backward out of my space in a dark parking lot, while the car I encountered came from my right. I was looking over my right shoulder, had to have been looking right at her. She had a dark car and was too busy lighting a cigarette to turn on headlights or even pay attention to surroundings. My ex-cop Crown Vic does have tinted windows. I think really good backup lights that threw light to the sides would have let me see the car as she drove behind me.
Front end design will make that "front backup" option more feasible for some than others, but it's always worth considering.
- Status
