shelm
Flashlight Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2011
- Messages
- 2,047
Anyone bought the Titanium XP-G2?
Having just bought the SS version, I can't see the 63% higher price is worth it for just 5 extra lumens. All other mode specs look the same.
Though, who knows, if I didn't already have the Preon 0, I might be tempted just for the cool titanium tube.
That's the point.
Still, would it have killed them to up the lumens to 60 or so? Oh well, high output isn't really the point of the light, I suppose.
Oh, I know. I just see it as a very niche product. They'll probably make money from it, though, since the design changes are so minimal and there's little cost in the redesign. Probably a lot higher margins, too.
Still, would it have killed them to up the lumens to 60 or so? Oh well, high output isn't really the point of the light, I suppose.
This is exactly why I'm buying my first new light in ages.I agree that it's pricy for not much increase in performance, but let's face it– the flashlight marketplace is filled with products that are bling, more jewelry than flashlight. The wristwatch market is similar; you can get dead-nuts accurate timekeeping for $50, but people still spend thousands for watches because they look nice. Nothing wrong with that, either.
In regards to the P0/A0, what's nice about this light is its sub-lumen low mode, and its reflectorless beam. In the dark, its jump from .25 lumens to 24 lumens is plenty. If the A0 had a .24L mode and went directly to 60L, it would be a blinding change. If FourSevens dumped the .25L mode, to accommodate a 60L high, it would ruin the usefulness of this light and it would just be another Olight, Thrunite, Fenix multimode AAA light.
Oh, I know. I just see it as a very niche product. They'll probably make money from it, though, since the design changes are so minimal and there's little cost in the redesign. Probably a lot higher margins, too.
Still, would it have killed them to up the lumens to 60 or so? Oh well, high output isn't really the point of the light, I suppose.
If you check calipsoiis photographs (posts 792 and 797), you can see that the heat sinking of the led is far from optimal. It is attached to a driver board, not directly to a metallic pill (which would have made the light clearly bigger).
Yeah, like the tain ti p0.At that price point, it doesn't really compare well to other keychain lights in the same category.
This is exactly why I'm buying my first new light in ages.
Looked to see if there was a warmer emitter available, but then realized that on a lower modes only light, I'd still go for the cooler tint.
The price increase is because of the metal used. Titanium. Titanium is more expensive than aluminum and harder to shape so of course the price will definitely be higher.
Is heat build-up an issue for the LED with extended run times, then? Mine only gets a bit warm when I use for an hour or so. Is the body getting rid of enough heat?
I like cooler tints on lower levels and warmer tints as the output goes up.When the intensity is low, warmer tints become increasingly pleasant to eyes... Think about the sun. Whether you like CW or NW, a midday sun in pretty pleasant to your eyes. It is also cool white (5500K-6000K; a lot more if it is cloudy). Late night/early morning sun is also pretty pleasant. It is not bright, and it is warm white. I like neutral whites but the fixed lights in my home are mainly 5800K. They are also pretty bright. I have some warmer and dimmer lights for evening use and when it comes to flashlights, my preferences generally change slightly towards warmer tints when the intensity gets lower.
but am really expecting satisfaction on this one.