:welcome:
Enjoy the light. Hope you find it as useful as I do mine.
And since you're new here let me be among the first to say hold tight to your wallet and/or say goodbye to your paycheck.
yes but the Fenix lights you mentioned are not as bright as the competitors.
Yeah, I agree that the haters do contribute a mood of unplesantness to many CPF threads.
But hey, whadaya expect? This is the internet, and haters are common on most internet forums.
Haters you encounter on all types of enthusiast forums tend to be rather ignorant of the topic overall, and they often know almost nothing about the particular item they are bashing.
If you think CPF is bad, try reading some of the Knife forums and Gun forums to get a little perspective on haters. ;>
.
example is the 4Sevens Quark AA. It also uses the XP-G and costs $60 like the new Mag, but I think most people would appreciate the 2AA format and lower low mode of the Quark--assuming that had both to compare side by side. And why did Mag get into using Cree so much later than everyone else? It's as if they're behind everyone else in every way.
Maglite is currently selling a 2-AA MiniMag with a Cree XP-E emitter for half the price of the Quark. I'm pretty sure that the Quark can't touch the throw or beam intensity of the MiniMag Cree. I suspect that Mag will sell more MiniMAG LEDs this year in WalMart alone than Quark will sell of all their flashlights combined.
usually ppl that are against somebodys opinion are called haters,the same counts for "fanboys", another term i dont like.This is the internet, and haters are common on most internet forums.
I suspect that Mag will sell more MiniMAG LEDs this year in WalMart alone than Quark will sell of all their flashlights combined.
...most ppl never heard of a quark or a Zebralight. The XL50 is cheaper but that dosnt mean its better, i would always invest 10 or 20 dollar more
I don't think it's so much a matter of hate as is a matter of frustration that Mag takes so long to put out something new while other companies on the internet are putting out new and better stuff ALL the time. Mag has been around for such a longer amount of time that you'd hope that they'd be the one in the lead of innovation. But even after they take so long to come out with something new, they end up releasing something that is inferior to what current competitors offer for the same, or even a lower, price.
One example is the 4Sevens Quark AA. It also uses the XP-G and costs $60 like the new Mag, but I think most people would appreciate the 2AA format and lower low mode of the Quark--assuming that had both to compare side by side. And why did Mag get into using Cree so much later than everyone else? It's as if they're behind everyone else in every way.
My advice to Mag is to look at what other manufacturers offer, look at what people like (read this forum) and then produce something along those lines. Making something that uses 3AAA and a very complicated interface wasn't the best way to go, although I do have to give them a thumbs up on making something that is different (motion control). I don't think it's all that practical for a flashlight for everyday use though.
I cant see what is so good about this light, i mean its cheap and you can dimm it, those are indeed great functions and i think this light is not so bad. On the other hand this light is very wide and long for AAA battery format, so the main advantage of the tiny size from AAA batteries is gone. I mean there are lights with 2xAAA like 4 Sevens Preon2 which are shorter and much slimmer, same price and you have tons of 1xAA lights which are also shorter and slimmer, most of them have 140 Lumen so the difference is not so big. Preon 2 2AA has 160 Lumen. Why Mag-Lite dont use 4xAAA? Anyway the wider and longer size is a bit too big for edc, thats why i use 1xAAA or 1xAA lights as EDC and 4XAA around the house. The new ZL Q50 will use 4XAA and its shorter then this light and it will do 800 Lumen