That doesn't sound good for consumers....a patent to stop other competitors from releasing a similar or competitive product in US.
Meaning if Sanyo or other manufacturers have a primary lithium AA, they can't sell it in US?
You spend a few hundred K or more on R and D and have someone making their own equivalent after ~50k in reverse engineering and some analytical chemistry((or just reading the patent :nana: )) , and undercutting you at 75% of the price and making a bigger profit margin. Now thats really not good for consumers as companies just wait for someone to spend the money and then take their idea
And Sanyo and Duracell can both sell primary lithium AA's, they just cant be lithium iron disulfide cells, if they find a new chemestry that isnt covered under the scope of energizer's patent, they can sell those.
http://www.google.com/patents?id=sG...ge&q=energizer lithium iron disulfide&f=false is the patent if youre curious, Claims are on page 9, and actually shows a lot of technical information about whats inside the cell rather then "some black crap, lithium foil, and a black rod" like you'd find opening it up.
However, in places where energizer's patent has expired, or they didnt get a patent, duracell and everyone can have at it, selling them there.