BanditoPete
Newly Enlightened
Going straight on the to-buy list
Same here. Probably will be a popular light.
Going straight on the to-buy list
I was going to address this before, but I let it slide. That graph shows a constant resetting to turbo instead of letting the programming kick the light down a mode and stay regulated at the lower output. The direct drive pattern you're seeing in that graph is the limitation of the cell, not the light. No single cell setup is going to be able to sustain that high draw for any extended period in a regulated manor and no 2 cell setup is going to be able to sustain an MT-G2 on turbo for any extended period of time either. Even Thrunite and Eagletac lights drop modes with their 3 cell setup because it's too high of a thermal demand, even disregarding the power requirements, for a light that size.
Sorry to say that any light from any manufacturer is going to be limited by the same rules. Look at the severe lumen drops on Thrunite or Nitecore. That's why I don't like lights that push for the highest output they sacrifice everything and play word games with run times just to achieve 1000+ lumens or just to achieve 100 or so lumens over their competition. That's not even going to be noticed at those light levels.
It looks regulated on turbo: http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?385510 It's the low capacity 2200mah cells. You seemed to ignore that the last time this came up though.
you're kidding, right?
2200, granted, are pretty crappy cells. but even LG D1 will just flatten out the red curve a bit. still DD. still crappy regulation
exactly! 2-cell setup is a poor choice for the high-Vf MT-G2. when you put them together you get the crappiest regulation in the flashlight industry
but my point is this. once the battery voltage goes down a bit on this LD60 you wouldn't get 2800 lumens anymore, even if you let it rest to cool down, because the individual voltages on them 18650's wouldn't be high enough. but if they were in series the driver would have enough voltage to drive the LEDs to maximum power. just look at the many fine examples of 3x 18650 in series out there
exactly! 2-cell setup is a poor choice for the high-Vf MT-G2. when you put them together you get the crappiest regulation in the flashlight industry
but my point is this. once the battery voltage goes down a bit on this LD60 you wouldn't get 2800 lumens anymore, even if you let it rest to cool down, because the individual voltages on them 18650's wouldn't be high enough. but if they were in series the driver would have enough voltage to drive the LEDs to maximum power. just look at the many fine examples of 3x 18650 in series out there
If I remember correctly, the fenix Tk70 turbo mode is also well regulated until it drops to high mode http://lygte-info.dk/review/Review Fenix TK70 UK.htmlAs an example, one of the only lights I know of to sustain a perfectly flat regulation at 1000+ lumens is the Fenix TK60. That's because it has the cell support and the infrastructure support to sustain that output. Another good example is the Olight SR92. I can't remember if it is perfectly flat off of the top of my head, but I know that it is pretty damn close. Again, that light has the proper supporting cell structure and infrastructure to properly regulate that high of an energy flux.
Regarding the bad regulation of newer lights it's a result of the lumen race; lumens sells. Therefore many manufacturers offer flashlights with a maximum output higher than the batteries are able to sustain. It would be enough to lower the max output with ~30% or so for getting a flat regulation for an hour.
I am looking forward to see runtime graph of LD60!
I though the LD series included only AA or AAA lights. I guess not anymore?
Well, that's not really the point of this light now is it. They have the tk75, which is the same design as the ld60, that throws for 110,000 cd. The ld60 is still respectable at 53,000 cd. This light is all about compact form with high output more than anything.