Am I not allowed to say anything negative about a product that completely disappointed me? I thought that was sort of the point of this forum. If I am the only one that has ever had a bad ZL product (which I am not) than the readers can take my view for what it is. I never said that all ZLs were bad, only the one I got. If 100 say it is great and 20 people have problems and they all voice their experience honestly, that is the way it is supposed to work. If we are not allowed to say anything negative because they are a sponsor then how can we trust anything on this forum?
first of all, i was just having some fun.
second, you can say whatever you want as many times as you want even if it's the same thing over and over again. third, so can i. fourth, you had the ZL for two days, and you got 95% of your money back, your level of disappointment seems disproportionately high to the level of time/money invested - honestly, i've met guys divorced from multi-year marriages that weren't as bitter as you (i kid, i kid
). and last, i was just having some fun. c'mon laugh a little, what's life without laughter.
anyway, i bought a PT Eos once that was defective out of the box. i was very disappointed because for the price i paid i was expecting a first quality item. i was also disappointed that i had to spend my own money to send it in for replacement. i have mentioned this a couple times on this forum, but only a couple... well, i guess it's three times since i'm mentioning it now. anyhow, i gave the replacement a chance and was happy with it. i think the PT Eos is a good headlamp and PT a good company. i had one brief bad experience. it did not sour me on all PT's. and i didn't spam every single PT thread about how awfully disappointed i was. i'm just saying.
i'm not saying that you should follow my example or anything... oh wait, no, that's exactly what i'm saying, isn't it.
again, i kid i kid.