Marduke
Flashaholic
I'm gonna say that a PROPER P7 light will be more powerful than what you have. Your numbers are rather impossible for how you are driving it, which tells me a proper light will probably be roughly twice as bright.
I'm gonna say that a PROPER P7 light will be more powerful than what you have. Your numbers are rather impossible for how you are driving it, which tells me a proper light will probably be roughly twice as bright.
I think that smaller batteries have less resistance,that is why i think they can provide such a high current. But in that case, you are taking the risk of an explosion..... A great in output/size flashlight but a great explosion is possible too... :(
its direct drived i measuring current draw to the led, the battery of my ultrafire c3 p7 are reversed because the back of the P7 is internal connected to the + side.
the battey its 14500 protected
![]()
![]()
stop talk about my great ultafire c3 p7 and lets find the most powerfull led powered with 3.7v
I'm pretty sure that's not a protected cell; you're running it at at least 4C, so it should cut out. If it is a protected cell, the protection circuit has failed, and it's just as dangerous as an unprotected cell. There's a serious risk of explosion or fire while you're holding that little firecracker.
DX, at least, sells some Trustfire cells that are labeled as protected, but actually aren't; I think you may have some of those. DX does warn that they're unprotected, but it could be easily overlooked, and less scrupulous vendors could not notify you at all.
EDIT: I'm not in any way denigrating the awesomeness of the concept of that light, but LiCo is not a suitable chemistry to use. You could do a similar upgrade in a CR123, 18500, or 18650 host, where you could use AW's IMR cells, with a LiMn chemistry that's safe for these discharge rates, but AFAIK there are no 3.7V 14500 cells made with safe high-drain chemistries.
internal resistance of battery: <= 100 milli ohmThe opposite is generally true. Such a small cell under such a high load would sag horribly in voltage. I would expect the voltage to be 3.2-3.5v under that load, DEFINITELY not 4.2v.
if i find this higher-power-than-p7 LED (3.7v)i will put it hereAre you planning on using this higher-power-than-p7 LED in the C3 host? If so, what was your plan for supplying it with 12v?
The opposite is generally true. Such a small cell under such a high load would sag horribly in voltage. I would expect the voltage to be 3.2-3.5v under that load, DEFINITELY not 4.2v.
Heh, I'm guessing you mean lux?jetbeam jet 1 pro v2(i love it:4850 lum-1m)
Yes, you are right in that, there is also the voltage drop.
By the time he is getting such a small runtime and high output the numbers seem to be ok. Maybe he bought a very low vf led.
But he still can't understand the danger of his project. It is like holding a bomb and waiting to explode. All of us are taking so many precautions for li-on batteries.Even if these numbers are wrong, i would be afraid to do what he did. This guy is driving it at least 3x max suggested current, not taking in account the heat from the led that goes to the battery.
Heh, I'm guessing you mean lux?
this led its more powerfull but i need 12v 3xaa (3x14500)I think it's a moot point. There is obviously some barrier here which is preventing the understanding that the P7/MC-E is already the highest power quad die LED, and the project in general (especially the host of choice) is absolutely ludicrous.
Oh well, it's no my hand being blown off here....
the jetbeam jet 1 pro v2 its the 14500 throw king, 4850 lum -1m world record
this led its more powerfull but i need 12v 3xaa (3x14500)
1400 lum-20w
lets find other more powerfull leds
the jetbeam jet 1 pro v2 its the 14500 throw king, 4850 lum -1m world record