Russ,
I have received nil response to my e-mails to you, but you do indeed respond in open forum. I have also screened my junk e-mail filter to ensure that I am not missing responses in that way.
Not having achieved a dialogue with UT over the past fortnight or so, it is a little odd that you will respond in open forum only.
I am attempting to get the light that you supplied faulty at the point of purchace, to work. I have now expended some $100 over and above the cost of the light in order to achieve this, hopefully with maybe another $30 on shipping and $50 in import duty, the faulty light that you supplied may eventually work. That is my hope.
Your returns policy states that I must make contact with you within 3 days (which I did) and that you will refund less of course the cost of shipping. You wouldn't want to be out of pocket for supplying faulty goods, would you? And naturally any expense your customer incurs in buying faulty products from you is not something you're going to be responsible for either?
The bottom line is if UT had supplied a working product (or had even bothered to check it), I would not be spending almost double the money to get it fixed.
I would appreciate it if UT would enter into a dialogue with me as a customer in a civil manner, instead of needing to use public forums in order to get a response. You do have both my business e-mail address and the e-mail address attached to my PayPal account, and I do monitor both daily.
It is indeed inappropriate that the only means of being responded to is through open forum, even more so that one person, being of greater standing and reputation can then use his weight and influence to attempt to quell the issue in that arena too. All I am ask is that a company supplying faulty product at a considerable retail price, take responsibility for supplying a product that works, and make restitution if that product is faulty so as not to burden their customer with the expense of fixing shipped faulty goods. That is not an unreasonable request in any country in the Western World I would hope.
I really wish you would deal with this as a customer service issue privately.
I was gonna give this a go, but others seem to have done a fairly succinct job already.
In breif, you have the EDC range running at 120 lumens. You have the more expensive Ra Clicky range running at 140 lumens. The black paint finish is much harder wearing (on the bezel) on the more expensive tactical, and it also has a narrower beam profile and a cooler white light. You're paying the extra for the additional 20 lumens. To all intent and purposes the rest is the same. The chart says it all in a nutshell.
I have copies of both of your emails. I have copies of my return emails from that Saturday night also.
You were offered a full refund. You were also offered a solution to get the light fixed without having to return it, to save you from return shipping , and that is what you chose.
Henry sent you a new switch and you have not contacted me since.
International shipping is expensive and a I'm sure aggravating for non-usa people, but it is what it is. Our shipping and return policies are posted on the website in more than one area. I cant help it if you don't agree with them.
I am a dealer. I do not "inspect" Ra lights. Just because the lights are shipped in a bag, does not mean that I am going to inpect them, no more than if they were in a box wrapped with plastic. It is not appropriate for me to do so.
Is this the same light you are trying to sell in this
thread, post#87?
Or, is it the custom light you bought from Henry you are going to sell, and keep the "faulty" light for yourself?
You say in one post that you are happy with the quality and performance of both of your lights. In another post you complain about the light not working.
What have you spent $100 on "trying to get the light to work"? You haven't returned a light.
You lost all credilbility with me when you posted the following on 3/07:
Originally Posted by
mbassoc2003
UT wash their hands of it and say it's HDS' problem. Thay offer no guarantee on products they sell from third party manufacturers, and say they will accept no returns. So much for customer service, eh? So right now I'm pretty pissed. Hope Henry has a solution.
This was posted BEFORE your second email to me and BEFORE I responded to your email!
your first email was at 6:36pm and your second email at 8:35pm. I returned your email at 10:19 on a Saturday night
When you stop posting lies about me in open forum, I will stop responding to them.
I'm sorry to take up space, but when someone tells lies about me in order to validate their position, I don't like it.
My intention is not to give Ian a bad rep, but to keep my reputation from being unfairly attacked with things that are untrue.
I'm sure this will be moved to another section.
I can post the emails and you can follow the timeline easier that way.