Something wrong. On this one webpage, I see 3 different tech specs with regards to the lumen rating.
On the left middle part of the page, the picture has some text beside it and it says:
"160 lumens HIGH with 25 min. runtime & ... "
On the right side near the top, there is text that says:
" ... but blazes out 40 lumens of brilliant white light on HIGH (8 hours ... "
Then on the right side, near the bottom where you would purchase the light, there is a drop down box and right above it says:
Select a configuration option for the high-low switch:
In the dropdown box, the options are "120 lumens HIGH ...".
So I am getting 3 different lumen rating all in one webpage that is trying to sell me a light!
Rob's products are fantastic in quality and performance. His website could stand to be updated a bit more often, but if you have any questions, he's quite quick to answer e-mails.
To address your points above:
The current LED he's using is capable of putting out 160 lumens for about 20-25 minutes with a 3.7v Li ion rcr2.
THE EXACT SAME LIGHT using a standard 3v cr2 camera battery will put out 40 lumens for 7-8 hours.
There "dropdown" box for configuration is out of date, as the current high output is now 160 vs 120 lumens.
My recommendation: buy the rechargeable version for [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
£40 and if you ever need to you can always use a primary cr2 as a long life (although lower output) backup.
From the photo below, it should be obvious that I have a liking for Orbs!
Tim
EDIT: Should have paid more attention to Mikes post above. I didn't notice that he'd already explained the differnce in performance.
OH Well, It still gives me another "excuse" to show off the "kids".
[/FONT]