Which brings me to the point. Why are people so exited over the G5 at 350 lumens when you can have either the Fenix TK30 at 370 lumens using 1x18650 (and option of 630 lumens with 2x18650) or Olight M21 at 500 lumens (according to 4sevens web) with 1x18650? Both the TK30 and the M21 are cheaper than the G5. Or am i completely missing the point?
Really good point made here - I'll give you my take. One of the differences in something like the TK30 versus the G5 is simply how easy/hard it is to carry on me. With the larger bezel on the TK30, I'm not apt to pick it up when I go on walks and rides. Don't get me wrong, I like the big lumens on the TK30 but not at the expense of the size (in most cases).
The M21 got mediocre reviews. It's rated at 500 lumens but most reviews rate it at 300 to 350 OTF lumens. In addition, there have been documented quality issues as well. For example, here's a blurb from a review on CPF:
"Two weeks ago I bought a "Olight M21". I had "Fenix TK10" (275 Lumens) and I bought the "Olight" because they are 500 Lumens. My first disappointment comes in when compared with the "Eagletac T20C2" of my brother. The "Eagletac" 300 lumens, illuminates more than the "Olight" 500 lumens. My second disappointment, a week after buying it, I drop a table 1 m in height, and stops working. Incredible. My "Fenix TK10" I fell from a ladder of four meters high, and continued working."
I seriously hope this doesn't sound like I'm bashing the TK30 nor the M21 - I'm sure they're great lights in their own right. However, I think it paints the picture as to why so many of us are pumped about the new 4Sevens G5: quality products from a quality company, great customer service, 350 OTF lumens, solid warranty, a smooth reflector with no flaws/rings in the beam profile, a true XP-G "thrower," unique interface, great size, cr123 and 18650 compatible...the list goes on.