I wondered if it was possible to use a single protected cell in series with unprotected ones to take advantage of the low-voltage cutout.
I first PM a member who then passed along the question to LuxLuthor who gave me the answer below and I'd like to thanks LuxLuthor here for his expert advice.
####
I would not recommend it for several reasons off the top of my head:
1) You would need exactly the same battery brand, capacity, chemistry, and batch date of manufacture, since there are differences in current flow rates, internal cell resistance, and other characteristics that need to be matched. This is also why battery packs have cell balancer and/or charge balancing to make sure cells are ongoingly monitored to remain in same state of voltage charge.
2) The protection PCB's have very low cutoffs for low voltage--many as low as 2.5V before it breaks circuit. For many applications it is too low.
That low voltage protection function is best served when there is a reasonable amp draw and end of charge is reached, there is a rapid dip down to 2.5V breaking circuit, then a rapid rebound back to a healthier voltage.
In lower amp draw applications, you will have a slower, more gradual dipping down of the discharge curve, and more time will be spent with cell in lower damage-inducing voltage range (below 3.0V).
In your friend's proposed scenario, there will be other cells that may be dipping down more or less, until the one with protection hits the 2.5V signal to break circuit.
When AlanB gets his regulation switch, it will have an ability to set a more reasonable low voltage cutoff of 3.0 to 3.2V to avoid damaging cells.
3) Even if you matched exact cell type, the protection circuit will give a different total resistance, and thereby not deliver the same level of amperage.
4) If this was a safe strategy, you would have seen battery packs using this cheaper strategy. They always have a protection setup for each cell, since any single cell in a pack can drift beyond desired range...so the only safe way is to monitor all of them individually.
I first PM a member who then passed along the question to LuxLuthor who gave me the answer below and I'd like to thanks LuxLuthor here for his expert advice.
####
I would not recommend it for several reasons off the top of my head:
1) You would need exactly the same battery brand, capacity, chemistry, and batch date of manufacture, since there are differences in current flow rates, internal cell resistance, and other characteristics that need to be matched. This is also why battery packs have cell balancer and/or charge balancing to make sure cells are ongoingly monitored to remain in same state of voltage charge.
2) The protection PCB's have very low cutoffs for low voltage--many as low as 2.5V before it breaks circuit. For many applications it is too low.
That low voltage protection function is best served when there is a reasonable amp draw and end of charge is reached, there is a rapid dip down to 2.5V breaking circuit, then a rapid rebound back to a healthier voltage.
In lower amp draw applications, you will have a slower, more gradual dipping down of the discharge curve, and more time will be spent with cell in lower damage-inducing voltage range (below 3.0V).
In your friend's proposed scenario, there will be other cells that may be dipping down more or less, until the one with protection hits the 2.5V signal to break circuit.
When AlanB gets his regulation switch, it will have an ability to set a more reasonable low voltage cutoff of 3.0 to 3.2V to avoid damaging cells.
3) Even if you matched exact cell type, the protection circuit will give a different total resistance, and thereby not deliver the same level of amperage.
4) If this was a safe strategy, you would have seen battery packs using this cheaper strategy. They always have a protection setup for each cell, since any single cell in a pack can drift beyond desired range...so the only safe way is to monitor all of them individually.