However, that being said, it is interesting to me how often the norm of "buying American" is reinforced here and elsewhere, even where the result has been a disaster.
I've seen that also. I actually have no preference for buying American or otherwise, though I can understand the sentiments of those who do, even if I don't personally agree with the reasoning.
Isolating U.S. companies from the market pressures of the world leads to weak businesses and poor value for the products they sell.
Well it's OK as long as people are consistent! Aka, *always* add a 15% value premium to made in USA for a product, etc. Hypothetically, it would only be a problem if people gave significant preference to 'made in USA' for a certain period of time, then dropped that significant preference later.
Offhand- what industries do you think the 'made in USA' bias has been a significant market factor? The only one I can think of is automobiles. Sure in other products some people prefer 'made in USA'-sometimes, but I'm not certain enough people have done that consistently enough for it to be a huge factor.
[/QUOTE]
To the poster who commented that stereotypes are not all without merit: yes, they ARE all without merit. That's the very definition of a stereotype- a generalization about a group based on the perceived characteristics of one or few people. That is by definition inaccurate, and almost always motivated by bias.
This could just be symantics - as in, maybe you only call something a stereotype if it *is* in fact being used inaccurately.
I'm not though, so...I think it depends on how a automatically/broadly a stereotype is applied...as well as it's accuracy. Like for instance - a stereotype about young guys with ratty jeans, shaved heads , a certain clothing style otherwise, and an angry looking demeanor in Russia being racists who are likely to beat you if you are not Caucasian. Say if I went to Russia with a non-Caucasian friend and saw some people of the aforementioned group in an well-lit alley that was normally a great shortcut. At that point - I'd stereotype those people. I'm not 100% sure that they're racists at all, but the risk is higher given my perceptions, so I'm going to side with my instincts and avoid it. Because, I do have a general idea what people of that nature dress like in Russia (humans have an pretty good ability to detect patterns), and I know the statistics that 50%+ of more immediate African-descent people in Moscow have been attacked, and I know the US state department travel warnings on the issue.
Or Wal*Mart - If I said people who shop at Wal*Mart are white trash, that would be an inaccurate stereotype. Not everyone who shops at Wal*Mart is white trash. Probably not even most. But...I would say the stereotype that a significantly higher percentage of Wal*mart's patrons are white trash, as compared to the average popular chain grocery store in the US, is probably accurate.
So my point is it all depends on how broadly one defines a stereotype/ignores evidence to the contrary about an individual which contradicts that stereotype.
This has become a rather odd...but fun conversation to be having here.