single sample comparison
Cosmetic differences:
Ultra-G is much darker green almost black on first glance. My just received Ultra is much paler green. Photo has been adjusted to show colors to as close to actual life color as possible.
Note the home-made wrist loop/strap on the Ultra-G - which also functions as a locator/extractor when carrying the light in my pocket
Beam differences -
photos are hard -
I post 2 shots - the only difference is that beam-shot 1 is taken with wide angle at 35mm equiv. and cropped to get image - Beam-shot 2 at about 60mm equiv and shot cropped much less both with lights about 7" away from standard letter sized white paper. Camera is Canon Digital ELPH S100 - set with daylight white balance set about 23" away from beam spots.
The difference I believe is the auto exposure - with beam-shot 1 there was a lot more in the original frame - darkness - so the camera gave more exposure - hence the larger hot spots when the photo is cropped to include only the beams. Whereas beam-shot 2 is using the zoom to limit the framing - so relatively speaking there is a lot more light beam in the frame - so the camera exposes the photo less therefore accentuating the differences in the central spots.
Beam-shot 1
Beam-shot 2
Neither shot shows all that the eye can see.
The Ultra is noticably bluer with slight violet over-tones.
The Ultra-G has the infamous "brown ring" separating the central blue-white spot and another equally bright blue-white ring (this is best seen with the light illuminating white surface about a yard away). I don't think it's really brown - just lower intensity with less blue content. But overall the Ultra-G is a better white and more even when in use. The plain Ultra seems to have more colors in its beam which does show in the beamshots.
The plain Ultra was stiffer to turn on/off. But I solved that easily by using some petroleum jelly very sparingly (wiping off any excess and being careful NOT to get any on the O-ring - petroleum jelly rots rubber) and working the threads using pushing and pulling pressure - then finally wiping off the threads with tissue so that only a minimal amount of lube is in the threads only.
I just got the Ultra (non-G) for $15.99 +$4 shipping from Texas Tactical Supply - who appear to be currently out of stock (and the site seems down again)
The Ultra-G was at the cpf special price of $19 +$6 shipping from County Comm.
So are the differences between the Ultra-G and the plain Ultra enough to justify the $5 extra for the "G" and the lack of the accessories of lanyard and pocket clip which I do not carry and ulikely to use? - probably not.
But do I feel hard done by?
ABSOLUTELY NOT
- would I buy another Ultra-G if I lost mine?
- at the cpf special price - YES
- at the $24 price - NO.
Cosmetic differences:
Ultra-G is much darker green almost black on first glance. My just received Ultra is much paler green. Photo has been adjusted to show colors to as close to actual life color as possible.
Note the home-made wrist loop/strap on the Ultra-G - which also functions as a locator/extractor when carrying the light in my pocket
Beam differences -
photos are hard -
I post 2 shots - the only difference is that beam-shot 1 is taken with wide angle at 35mm equiv. and cropped to get image - Beam-shot 2 at about 60mm equiv and shot cropped much less both with lights about 7" away from standard letter sized white paper. Camera is Canon Digital ELPH S100 - set with daylight white balance set about 23" away from beam spots.
The difference I believe is the auto exposure - with beam-shot 1 there was a lot more in the original frame - darkness - so the camera gave more exposure - hence the larger hot spots when the photo is cropped to include only the beams. Whereas beam-shot 2 is using the zoom to limit the framing - so relatively speaking there is a lot more light beam in the frame - so the camera exposes the photo less therefore accentuating the differences in the central spots.
Beam-shot 1
Beam-shot 2
Neither shot shows all that the eye can see.
The Ultra is noticably bluer with slight violet over-tones.
The Ultra-G has the infamous "brown ring" separating the central blue-white spot and another equally bright blue-white ring (this is best seen with the light illuminating white surface about a yard away). I don't think it's really brown - just lower intensity with less blue content. But overall the Ultra-G is a better white and more even when in use. The plain Ultra seems to have more colors in its beam which does show in the beamshots.
The plain Ultra was stiffer to turn on/off. But I solved that easily by using some petroleum jelly very sparingly (wiping off any excess and being careful NOT to get any on the O-ring - petroleum jelly rots rubber) and working the threads using pushing and pulling pressure - then finally wiping off the threads with tissue so that only a minimal amount of lube is in the threads only.
I just got the Ultra (non-G) for $15.99 +$4 shipping from Texas Tactical Supply - who appear to be currently out of stock (and the site seems down again)
The Ultra-G was at the cpf special price of $19 +$6 shipping from County Comm.
So are the differences between the Ultra-G and the plain Ultra enough to justify the $5 extra for the "G" and the lack of the accessories of lanyard and pocket clip which I do not carry and ulikely to use? - probably not.
But do I feel hard done by?
ABSOLUTELY NOT
- would I buy another Ultra-G if I lost mine?
- at the cpf special price - YES
- at the $24 price - NO.