Confederate
Enlightened
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2006
- Messages
- 360
I've purchased a few Fenix lights to throw in my bugout/emergency bag, and I want each member of my family to have at least one. I've also purchased dozens of 123A batteries, since they have a shelf life of ten years. Still, I have a few questions I hope you guys can help with.
1) Is the extra $$$ for Fenix lights worth it, or would it be better to have several lower cost lights, like the Solarforce L2 and other quality lights? Naturally, runtime is an issue with survival lights. I need a light that will run in an extremely low mode for extended times. Will the more inexpensive lights offer the same long runtimes?
2) Is there any significant advantage of having the build of a T1, TK-11? The P3D seems to have a sufficient build, but for a bugout bag is there anything to be gained by having a light that a car could run over? They all appear to be dunkable in water, but what does the bulkier build provide? Better heat sinking?
3) If one wanted to recharge batteries with a solar device, which is the best way to go? I'm told that amorphous solar panels have a relatively short shelf life and even if left in its box that the materials will break down over about six or seven years. Mono-crystalline chargers are more expensive, but they last indefinately, which I like. Still, I have a solar-powered watch that has been going for more than seven years and it's still doing fine, so, which way to go?
Thanks!
1) Is the extra $$$ for Fenix lights worth it, or would it be better to have several lower cost lights, like the Solarforce L2 and other quality lights? Naturally, runtime is an issue with survival lights. I need a light that will run in an extremely low mode for extended times. Will the more inexpensive lights offer the same long runtimes?
2) Is there any significant advantage of having the build of a T1, TK-11? The P3D seems to have a sufficient build, but for a bugout bag is there anything to be gained by having a light that a car could run over? They all appear to be dunkable in water, but what does the bulkier build provide? Better heat sinking?
3) If one wanted to recharge batteries with a solar device, which is the best way to go? I'm told that amorphous solar panels have a relatively short shelf life and even if left in its box that the materials will break down over about six or seven years. Mono-crystalline chargers are more expensive, but they last indefinately, which I like. Still, I have a solar-powered watch that has been going for more than seven years and it's still doing fine, so, which way to go?
Thanks!