brickbat
Enlightened
...so what you are doing is imaging the glass ...
Agreed. Further, unless you've compensated for the emissivity of the glass (which is less than 1), the readings are low.
...so what you are doing is imaging the glass ...
Air only transmits heat if it moves. I do imagine that the design of the LEDs could create a bit of a chimney effect. I wonder if we will see that the LEDs at the top will degrade faster.
Well, I, for one, don't need to hide my embarassingly childish amount of envy behind valid scientific criticism, and I'm not afraid or ashamed nor too proud to say... damn, nice thermal imager you have there. Thanks for posting the awesome thermal images. Does it work on cats?
apologies for being pedantic, but my guess is that it is more accurate to say "air only transmits heat well if it moves". Conduction still works even if convection isn't being used, right?
apologies for being pedantic, but my guess is that it is more accurate to say "air only transmits heat well if it moves". Conduction still works even if convection isn't being used, right?
...Air only transmits heat if it moves....
The interesting ( to me, anyway) part with these 'filament LED lamps' is I've read (earlier in this thread) these lamps are helium-filled. Helium has a different heat transfer ability than air, and I recall it being a lot better.
Looks like OSRAM/Sylvania holds a relevant patent:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20040201990#legal-events
Interesting. If they're helium filled, it seems they would light up with a peach colored glow in the presence of a strong RF field. This could be a means of verifying the gas used.
It occurs to me that a helium filled design, will likely make it more fragile and prone to factory defects. The choice of reliable brand may be important. Greenbuildingadvisor article alludes to a percentage of initial failures.
The pattent thing is interesting. I wonder if Big Brother will step in to identify and help negotiate a settlement, as to part of the national effort toward energy independence, since 75 lpw to 105 is nearly a 50% improvement on a fledgling technology.
For other readers not familiar with power factor, could you explain why they should care? (I'm talking about average residential users here...)
...A good portion of that "efficiency" is from a design that has no power factor correction...
And, if this is really true, it seems like we trade good PF for efficiency - so what's the point?
And, if this is really true, it seems like we trade good PF for efficiency - so what's the point?