It's very, very different where I live.
Lantern batteries are cheaper than 4 x D cells of equivalent chemistry here.
But that's not the real point.
I shouldn't have to point out the inherent advantages of an F cell over a D.
The pressure of miniturization is off and the cells have the freedom to perform as they should.
An example is service life.
I have a Big Jim with a heavy duty (that's zinc-carbon mind you, not even the super heavy duty zinc-chloride) battery, and after eight years of occasional use in the boot of my car, where it is subject to temperature and moisture extremes, still delivers 5.4V at the bulb. D cells would have died more than four years ago.
But everything else improves, too.
The "bounces back after use" recovery is far more pronounced in this size.
Internal resistance of a larger cell, for the same chemistry, is much lower.
Shelf life is longer for the same chemistry.
The cells are more robustly constructed, and less likely to leak in the first place, and the jacket substantially contains the damage even if they do.
And so on. It's chalk and cheese. There is no reason, other than cost, to send a D cell boy on a man's errand.
Just make sure you're comparing apples with apples.