Turbo DV8 said:
I guess it depends on your Wal-Mart. I bought several packs today with a matching number of coupons, and asked if the coupons could be scanned before the cells. He said no, and that the $5 is taken off after taxes on the full $8.97 are calculated, so I had to pay tax on the full amount.
Don't know if you're new to California or even to the U.S., if so, welcome!, but most states (not just California) charge sales tax on the retail store's actual price. At Wal*Mart, that price is $8.97 for a 4 pack of those batteries. The fact that you have a
Manufacturer's Coupon for $5 off does not change Wal*Mart's price, it is still $8.97 and they will collect sales tax based upon that amount. Wal*Mart (or any other retailer) will receive $5 plus handling fee from the manufacturer (instead of you), but the total sale price for the retail store is still $8.97 (you pay $3.97 and Rayovac pays $5,) and they would be obligated to collect sales tax based upon that amount. On the other hand, if the scenario were that Wal*Mart took it upon themself to reduce their price on the item to $3.97, then they would only collect sales tax based upon the entire amount of the sale, which would be $3.97. The same would also apply if Wal*Mart ran the coupon instead of Rayovac. One other scenario (and I'm sure a lot of people get confused on this one) is when an individual store runs a Manufacturer's coupon (like the Costco coupon books.) In those cases the sale is treated the same as the earlier scenario with the manufacturer's coupon and tax would be charged on the full retail price that is set by the retailer.
Turbo DV8 said:
Another thing that frosted my balls, although it amounted to 10 cents, was I had purchsed about 20 packs of AA cells without coupon in another county, at 8.75% sales tax. I wanted to return the packs in my county, which has 8.25% sales tax, then repurchase the unopened packs with my coupons. When he rang up the return it only refunded me the tax at 8.25%, since I was at a Wal-Mart in a county with 8.25% tax. He said it was the way the system worked, and he could not override it. Although not a bank-breaker, I see this as unjust. You can return a Wal-Mart purchase at any Wal-Mart. If I had purchased a $1000 TV in one county, and crossed the county line to return it at another Wal-Mart and get my money back, why should the state be allowed to keep $5 of my money for a sale that for all practical purposes did not take place? Why can't the biggest retailer in America set up their system to take this into account? Am I being unreasonable?
On this point, you're right. The full amount of the sales tax should have been refunded to you. But the clerk at Wal*Mart said that
he couldn't override the system, he didn't say that it couldn't be overridden. It's very possible that no one in the store knew. Let's face it, many of the people who work in retail these days aren't the sharpest tools in the shed. If you kept all the paperwork, I'm sure you could get your dime back though you might have to contact their store or regional manager to find someone who knows how to do a refund manually based upon your original sales receipt.