BeastFlashlight
Flashlight Enthusiast
I agree that the problem is a stagnation of LED advancement. It WAS moving so fast but now how long has XML2 and XPG2 been the pinnacle? It's been awhile now, where the hell is XPG3 at??
I agree that the problem is a stagnation of LED advancement. It WAS moving so fast but now how long has XML2 and XPG2 been the pinnacle? It's been awhile now, where the hell is XPG3 at??
My personal economy is better than it has ever been. For most of my CPF time, I've been a poor student..
Now, however, there's no reason to buy any more lights. I have all the lights I could ever need, and then some.
To compound this issue, no one is bringing out new, innovative designs that tempt me, and no one is updating LEDs, so there's no reason to upgrade to new modules.
It would take something like the PhD project, or the PD lights, to tempt me out of my non-buying state. It seems the days of projects like that, and design innovation like that, are over.
My personal economy is better than it has ever been. For most of my CPF time, I've been a poor student..
Now, however, there's no reason to buy any more lights. I have all the lights I could ever need, and then some.
To compound this issue, no one is bringing out new, innovative designs that tempt me, and no one is updating LEDs, so there's no reason to upgrade to new modules.
It would take something like the PhD project, or the PD lights, to tempt me out of my non-buying state. It seems the days of projects like that, and design innovation like that, are over.
We seem to have reached a plateau right now.
Too many similar lights in each brand but nothing really tempting and adventurous in design.
A lot of companies have near identical versions of somebody else's lights, right up and down the range.
Where does one go when one has reached the end of the rainbow?
CHEERS
This X 1000.
I clearly remember a decade ago being so jazzed about having just received my brand new, state of the art, cutting edge, Elektrolumens FT-3C. Feed it three C-cells and you'd get 70 emitter lumens out the other end. On and off, that was it. Thing was though, it was putting out 2 to 3 times the light you'd get from a Mag Light at half the size. Non-flashaholics would look on with amazement at the wonder you held in your hand.
Nowadays, these whippersnappers can't fall out of a tree without landing on a tiny little, multi-mode pocket blowtorch pushing close to a thousand lumens off of a single cell. You're welcome, young fellas.
Ok you love your old school hosts I get it, but don't you think it's a good idea to send them in to have the LEDs modernized to the latest and brightest/most efficient every now & then? Best of both worlds!! I say if u have a great host keep it forever & upgrade it once in awhileStop looking forward and start looking back in time.
Lots of amazing lights, especially in the Custom field, built years ago are still plenty bright and have charisma and personality and offer user satisfaction that today's cookie cutter mass produced gimmicky lights could not dream of.
I wish I could fit that all in my sigline.
Ok you love your old school hosts I get it, but don't you think it's a good idea to send them in to have the LEDs modernized to the latest and brightest/most efficient every now & then? Best of both worlds!! I say if u have a great host keep it forever & upgrade it once in awhile
I agree that the problem is a stagnation of LED advancement.
We seem to have reached a plateau right now.
Too many similar lights in each brand but nothing really tempting and adventurous in design.
A lot of companies have near identical versions of somebody else's lights, right up and down the range.
Where does one go when one has reached the end of the rainbow?
I am in the same boat as jellydonut here. I recently just bought a few lights to catch up but I agree that there's not all that much interesting new developments happening right now... mostly just emitter upgrades and rehashes of same-old, same-old.
I do not have much interest in more flashlights that are simply a bit smaller or a bit brighter and why get anything that is less then what I have now. I need a big leap in tech for me to push the button.
For what it's worth, the better LEDs these days barely break 100 lm/W at high currents and elevated junction temperatures. Sure, that's a huge leap from a few years ago, but there is potential for yet another doubling of LED efficiency and then some. Granted, this will take much longer than the last doubling, but I'd say we have until at least 2020 before LED technology really plateaus for good.It's far too early to say that LED flashlights have plateau'd. It only seems that way because of the furious rate of development in LED technology over the last decade. Now the tech is more refined and so without any huge leaps, all the manufacturers are catching up to each other and things feel stagnant.
I think a more mature market might get more people to buy high-end flashlights who otherwise wouldn't have touched them. The reason is simple-nobody likes buying things which are the best today, but eclipsed in short time by something better. That's often why people have held off on computer upgrades for as long as possible. The rationale is in six months I'll pay half as much for what is considered cutting edge technology today. For a while it was the same with LEDs. Now that the pace of improvement is dramatically slowing down, you can buy a good light with the confidence that you won't need to buy a better one in six months to stay significantly ahead of the curve.In my opinion they're far from that. You just need to look at a more mature hobby market, like knives or watches. The basic automatic watch mechanism hasn't changed much in the last couple hundred years but there are no shortage of companies turning them out and no shortage of forums full of people buying them. Don't worry, flashlights aren't going anywhere, they're just going to need to work harder for their customers.
On the first point, we're getting close to theoretical maximums now at very low currents but we still have a factor of two or more to go until we get there at higher currents. Agreed on all the other points. I doubt we'll see 100 CRI emitters but CRI 97 or 98 is easily possible even now. The market generally doesn't demand that due to the efficiency hit but this could change once LEDs become so efficient that they're still over 200 lm/W even at very high CRIs.My guess is that LED's will continue to improve:
- first in efficiency, but only for a little while until they reach the theoretical max, then that'll stagnate, similiar to how li-ion batteries haven't seen anything new in many years
- then second in tint, when manufacturers realize they need something new to sell in 2016 and aim for widespread adoption of 100CRI neutral emitters (to finally shake the 'leds are blue' stigma that the public carries)
- third in emitter size, which will grant higher numbers on paper but ultimately prove useless for 90% of what people around here need them for
Sometimes simpler is indeed better. Complex UIs never really were my cup of tea for the simple reason I'll quickly forget how to program them. I think keeping the UI fairly simple appeals to the vast majority of buyers.- experiment (somewhat unsuccessfully) with new UI and control schemes then go back to either 3-level clicky or 1-level lights
I'm not sure I agree here. Barring some major advancement in battery technology, I'm not seeing incandescent flashlights remaining more than a niche item. The reason people went to LEDs, despite some drawbacks to some people with tint and CRI, is because the runtime/brightness advantages outweighed those disadvantages. Another reason is the most popular tint here seems to be neutral white. This is something incandescents by their nature are incapable of delivering. Among the masses, tint and to some extent even CRI are pretty much irrevelant in the portable lighing market. Get CRI past 80, and CCT anywhere between about 4000K and 6500K, and for most people that's good enough for a flashlight or camping lantern. That said, there are some interesting advances in incandescent, namely IRC. We have 2X bulbs now. If this technology continues to improve, we may eventually have incandescents which approach 100 lm/W. Moreover, we may be able to selectively return some visible wavelengths to the filament, increasing efficiency and allowing any desired CCT. If we can do these things cheaply, then it's possible incandescent may have a resurgence.I fully expect a resurgence in incandescents, and I'd be very surprised if that didn't happen soon. I can go to any record shop in town right now and buy an LP record. An LP! There are garage sales every single weekend with people selling their old turntables for $10 and the kids are spending $45 on vinyl these days. Everything old is new again and once CPF'ers get bored of LED and their neighbours all have Costco 10,000lm pocket torches they're going to be itching to spend on something retro and incandescent fits that bill perfectly. I fully expect to see the old SF's become highly desirable, FiveMega to have a serious boom in business, and the A2/M6 to once again show themselves as the last great incans, built at a time when incan technology had plateau'd and the collectors were probably wondering whether the flashlight economy had grown stagnant.