Couldn't you make the mode programable like the HDS lights? Maybe have it like the Fenix light head loosing for the 2nd profile. You're planning to make multiple PCB with different outputs? Isn't that costly? Why not make it like your HF light. Instead of turning to change brightness it's be for selecting profiles. Include 3 simple profile. 1st 2mode 35lumens/Max. 2nd 5modes starts with moonlight. 3rd Signal flashing modes.
Hi Newguy2012,
The Zeus PCB has mode selection built into its architecture.
The V1 UI is very unique and changes are not with the head, not with the clicky...
....the roadmap for the Zeus PCB is to do exactly that (and I've already designed a head with that functionality) use the clicky for on/off and a rotary selector on the head to do mode selection
For V1 I've wanted to keep the mechanics to a minimum (as this has to be waterproof/brickproof too) but additional head options will definitely come.
For Apollo, think of the multiple PCB thing as more of a swappable Jumper/PCB, like a nano-SD card that you can easily swap. This works independently of the head and PCB/Drivers.
Making a reasonable quantity of the Jumper PCBs, the cost will be low enough as they are tiny, and have just a single component. My plan is to include a default set (perhaps 5) for custom mode settings and an optional Jumper kit for even more customized output settings.
This is a concept photo of the underside of the tailcap for Apollo...
To give you some bearings, imagine you unscrew the tail from a standard clicky flashlight, and turned it upside down so the clicky switch is pointing towards the ground and you are looking inside the tail.
The gold pin in the center makes contact with the (-) of the battery.
The jumper-pcb just drop into the cavities and sit on top of the green base that says "Mode1, Mode2".
The default mode output will be set and you'll never have to touch it if you don't want to...
But... as 20% of requests are about "I need 80 lumens instead of 120", or "0.1 lumens instead of 5 lumens"..
this option, will make it much easier to let everyone have it their way (no soldering needed) whilst at the same time, having a very simple, no fuss UI.
I often offer customizations where possible and never charge for my time beyond materials costs.
When its one or two a month, these are fun projects to do as a hobby.
When it turns into several a week, it becomes a challenge to get them all done without either enlisting paid help or streamlining the efficiency of implementing the request, or better still, make it so that you can do all those things on your end with no soldering, no tools, no manuals.
Even something as simple as this though, parts have to be made, components matched, sizes confirmed....
and this is just for the tail...
Fortunately, every single product iteration/batch has been an improvement on the previous.
I could easily just keep things as they are for the HF/R series which is now a very very solid tool but a lot of the changes I've been working on are completely under the hood and invisible to a casual observer, yet they help improve the reliability and ease of configuration which is a critically important factor when you are making things in modest sized batches (vs batches of 10K or 100K).
Hope that sheds some light on things and thanks for taking an interest.
Tgwnn