tjh
Enlightened
Re: SkyRC IFA 2014 MC3000 charger-analyzer
edit: I'm 100% wrong, see below.
edit: I'm 100% wrong, see below.
Last edited:
Not currently, but if they became really popular a simple firmware update and they would be supported.
No, they require a special designed connection in the charger.
Actual charging algorithm is normal LiIon.
I have taken a look at the older generation: http://lygte-info.dk/review/batteries2012/Kentli AA 2800mWh (Blue) UK.html
Today i am testing FW1.14beta
i am guessing that one could build a DIY adapter for this exotic battery in mc3k slot, similar to the Kentli charger's positive terminal:
Hello DeJaVu, the <UP+SNB> works also when a slot is charging 1 battery. For example [11] be assigned to <UP+SNB1> and the charger status be:If new firmware is in the works, how about they make the program shortcuts(currently UP+SNB) usable while theyre at it. Big issue with using the shortcuts, is that if you already have 1 battery charging you cant use them because pressing up or down takes you to DDV(voltage + temp graphs). Either priority can be used, say if any slot in READY state then pressing UP or DOWN doesnt activate DDV, or make DDV a longpress command on UP or DOWN. Also at the moment you can only program 4 shortcuts, make that 8 by adding the DOWN+SNB.Easier to make full use of the function if youre using more than 1 chemistry. That DOWN+SNB combination sitting unused for very long, time to get it in the game
8? 😶Also at the moment you can only program 4 shortcuts, make that 8 by adding the DOWN+SNB.Easier to make full use of the function if youre using more than 1 chemistry. That DOWN+SNB combination sitting unused for very long, time to get it in the game
God damnit, it was working all this time.........Hello DeJaVu, the <UP+SNB> works also when a slot is charging 1 battery. For example [11] be assigned to <UP+SNB1> and the charger status be:#1 [01] busy; #2 [02] empty; #3 [03] ready; #4 [01] empty.Now hit the <UP+SNB#1>-keys at the very same time.
Yeah it would be nice addition.Personally i would use 4 for Li-Ion and 4 for Ni-Mh as those are the most common chemistries i use, and at the moment 4 are just not enough to cover most popular battery sizes.Im sure other people would tailor it to their specific needs.8? 😶
OIC
No promises when we get your 8 but i am seconding it. Good call!
If anyone has another suitable suggestion for DOWN+SNB, please let us know thanks appreciated! Otherwise we'll do the 8 np. 😝
i've added your 2 suggestions to de list. you might see them as improvements but imho the longpress-for-DDV is a toss. by now i am firmly used to shortclick-for-DDV (and i certainly enjoy hitting the charger) as detailed in all the documentation (MANUAL, CHEAT SHEET). I'd rather agree with the 8 memories but this would entail changes in both the manual and cheat sheet too. from what i can tell, from now on it will take longer and longer until we see such minor fine-tunings finally accepted and realized. the folks prefer to wait and collect more suggestions or more substantial ones, before they finally agree that altogether the changes are warranted in 1 batch job.but still it would be nice from usability perspective, to add slight delay to DDV, like 1second or so.
With the current configuration you can still miss-click and dont get the desired effect which is somewhat frustrating.
DDV longpress = happy program shortcut users
well, we the community are developing.
they only do the implementation :thumbsup:
that's how i sees it
mine idles around 40~44ºC and reaches 50~61ºC depending on the external setup. i am so pleased with it 😚 that i did a quick review:I've got mine already. It is a chinese one, but I am very happy with it... The temp is now about 35~38ºC at idle (7ºC less than before), and 60ºC compiling, for example. It's a very good result.
Completely ignored??Another idea I'm thinking about is related to calibration and voltage measurement.
Currently only one value both for voltage and current is used for calibration and so the charger simply scales the readouts according to the computed calibration factors.
But to take care of voltage offset issues, if feasible, the charger could enable an advanced voltage calibration to compute both an offset and a scaling factor to improve voltage measurement. Obviously the user will have to use two different cells to be able to calibrate at 2 corresponding voltages (and not too close one to the other to have a better offset estimation).
What do you think about this idea?
sorry, i couldn't understand the need for two point calibration.Completely ignored??