woodrow
Flashlight Enthusiast
I was at Lowe's today and I saw 1 Surefire 6PL (with the p60L led in it) on the shelf with dust on it. It called out to me and I knew that it needed a good home. The light was sealed in plastic, so I could not activate it to check its tint...but I decided to buy it anyway.
When I got back to my car, I quickly cut it out of its package (after paying the nice lady $91 for the light after tax) To my delight, the tint seemed a cool shade of white and the light seemed decently bright... for as much as I could tell at 4:30pm. I played around with it a work for a while, and finally tonight, I was able to compare it to my Fenix T1 which has not been picked up by its new owner yet.
How do the lights compare? To be honest, while I will always hold a fond place in my heart for the Surefire 6p...as the incan version was my first "real" flashlight bought back in 1989...I could not figure out why people were buying them... when to my understanding, the T1 seemed like such a better light. The T1 can produce 225 or 60 lumens with a twist of the body after all, and it is less money than the 6PL...and possibly just as tough. Well, after holding the 6P in my hand, I can see why so many people like it, and even why many would like it over the Fenix.
Here is a picture of the lights side by side
The fenix is slightly longer, wider and thicker than the 6PL. The Fenix also weighs slightly more. The Fenix also has most of its weight more towards its head than the 6PL does. That was the first point I had to give to the 6PL...it is better balanced than the T1. The 6PL also has deeper checkering, but I don't think many people drop their T1...unless they are doing one of many torture tests that we have seen here.
Here is a picture of the 6PL's bezel. I like that the glass is recessed a little back from the front of the head. Not as far back as the Fenix mind you, but recessed none the less.
One nice thing about the 6PL is that it can use 17670 protected batteries. I like these better than rcr123a's, because I simply HATE the quick trip to black the rcr123a's give you when they are spent.
When the 6PL starts out on the 17670, I could not notice a significant difference between the light running on it or primaries. After an hour and a half, a difference was more noticeable.
Here are some some beamshots of the 6PL and the Fenix T1 at a couple of meters. The camera was locked at 1/10th of a second at f/2.8. White balance is at daylight.
First, the 6PL on a AW 17670 protected 3.7v battery after 1&1/2 hours of being on.
Next, the light on SF primaries
The Fenix T1 on Medium
The Fenix T1 on High
And to show spill beam size...The 6PL and T1 (med)
So, after a short time with the 6PL, I can see where people would really like it. While it is not NEARLY as bright as the Fenix T1 on high...it is decently bright, and it will run on a 17670 if you desire to do so. I took the 17670 (after powering the 6PL for this review) out of the 6PL and put it in the Fenix...and immediately saw the light get dimmer and flicker (while on high). It is also nice to know that the 6PL has a lifetime warranty and brighter leds are available from aftermarket companies now, and soon will be from Surefire. (P61L) Not to mention all the beamshapers, filters, holsters etc. available for the light.
My overall conclusion... For brightness and versatility the Fenix T1 takes the stock Surefire 6PL hands down....not even a contest.
But it is in other areas that make me really glad I bought the 6PL today. First and foremost, it is just lighter and better balanced than the T1. Since I will be mainly using it in addition to the Tiablo MA6, its lack of over the top brightness does not kill the deal for me. I also like the very wide spill of the SF. It lights up enough of the immediate surroundings, that it Partially makes up for the light not being over 200 lumens. Lastly, I kind of look forward to getting the P61L for it when it comes out.
So, while not having 2 levels of output or being as bright as any of the Q5 lights I have bought lately.... I see this light being taken with me to work on a daily basis.... Something that not all my super bright - super versatile Q5 lights get to do.
When I got back to my car, I quickly cut it out of its package (after paying the nice lady $91 for the light after tax) To my delight, the tint seemed a cool shade of white and the light seemed decently bright... for as much as I could tell at 4:30pm. I played around with it a work for a while, and finally tonight, I was able to compare it to my Fenix T1 which has not been picked up by its new owner yet.
How do the lights compare? To be honest, while I will always hold a fond place in my heart for the Surefire 6p...as the incan version was my first "real" flashlight bought back in 1989...I could not figure out why people were buying them... when to my understanding, the T1 seemed like such a better light. The T1 can produce 225 or 60 lumens with a twist of the body after all, and it is less money than the 6PL...and possibly just as tough. Well, after holding the 6P in my hand, I can see why so many people like it, and even why many would like it over the Fenix.
Here is a picture of the lights side by side
The fenix is slightly longer, wider and thicker than the 6PL. The Fenix also weighs slightly more. The Fenix also has most of its weight more towards its head than the 6PL does. That was the first point I had to give to the 6PL...it is better balanced than the T1. The 6PL also has deeper checkering, but I don't think many people drop their T1...unless they are doing one of many torture tests that we have seen here.
Here is a picture of the 6PL's bezel. I like that the glass is recessed a little back from the front of the head. Not as far back as the Fenix mind you, but recessed none the less.
One nice thing about the 6PL is that it can use 17670 protected batteries. I like these better than rcr123a's, because I simply HATE the quick trip to black the rcr123a's give you when they are spent.
When the 6PL starts out on the 17670, I could not notice a significant difference between the light running on it or primaries. After an hour and a half, a difference was more noticeable.
Here are some some beamshots of the 6PL and the Fenix T1 at a couple of meters. The camera was locked at 1/10th of a second at f/2.8. White balance is at daylight.
First, the 6PL on a AW 17670 protected 3.7v battery after 1&1/2 hours of being on.
Next, the light on SF primaries
The Fenix T1 on Medium
The Fenix T1 on High
And to show spill beam size...The 6PL and T1 (med)
So, after a short time with the 6PL, I can see where people would really like it. While it is not NEARLY as bright as the Fenix T1 on high...it is decently bright, and it will run on a 17670 if you desire to do so. I took the 17670 (after powering the 6PL for this review) out of the 6PL and put it in the Fenix...and immediately saw the light get dimmer and flicker (while on high). It is also nice to know that the 6PL has a lifetime warranty and brighter leds are available from aftermarket companies now, and soon will be from Surefire. (P61L) Not to mention all the beamshapers, filters, holsters etc. available for the light.
My overall conclusion... For brightness and versatility the Fenix T1 takes the stock Surefire 6PL hands down....not even a contest.
But it is in other areas that make me really glad I bought the 6PL today. First and foremost, it is just lighter and better balanced than the T1. Since I will be mainly using it in addition to the Tiablo MA6, its lack of over the top brightness does not kill the deal for me. I also like the very wide spill of the SF. It lights up enough of the immediate surroundings, that it Partially makes up for the light not being over 200 lumens. Lastly, I kind of look forward to getting the P61L for it when it comes out.
So, while not having 2 levels of output or being as bright as any of the Q5 lights I have bought lately.... I see this light being taken with me to work on a daily basis.... Something that not all my super bright - super versatile Q5 lights get to do.
Last edited: