ACMarina said:
Not IMO.. Wilson would be more along the lines of McGizmo - a brand that most everybody respects, and if they would use they do so.
I think Surefire would be equal to a lot of the big American manufacturers - they have some inexpensive models, most are within a relatively similar price range, and for those that want to go scott crazy you can spend your life's savings..
Gotta agree here. Wilson is a "custom", even if hanging on the edges of "production" realm.
Browning, Colt, HK, S&W, Sig, all produce "surefire" (note: lower-case "s") handguns
(and firearms in general).
One of the wonderful things about Browning/etc. firearms in general -- you can pick up a
1950's vintage production piece, and unless it has been abused, it's as good as anything
made today (and many, myself included, would strongly argue
better). I've got an
old (pre-1900) Winchester 1886 takedown (lever-action rifle) production piece that will
just embarrass any production rifle made today (quality of action, quality of wood, "feel")
and that you might
approach for about $5,000 in quality custom gunsmithing. It uses
.45-70 ammo, readily available in most any hunting/etc. store across the U.S. Care to
speculate on CR123A battery availability a
century from now? (Not to mention MN02 or
MN21 or like bulbs!)
Surefire(tm)-quality firearms are the "norm", not the rare and ridiculously-expensive
exception.
Is this a great country, or what? (Ahem: that
is a rhetorical question, not political flame-bait)
-RDH