Surefire U2 Ultra

Candle Power Forums

Help Support Candle Power:

Kiessling

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 26, 2002
Messages
16,140
City & State/Province
Old World
Some impressions.

Construction and Machining

Besides being perfectly machined and built like a typical Surefire, one distinctive feature of the U2 is the new clip. While it is certainly beautiful, it offers bezel-down carry which I find preferable for this class of light. Together with the ingenious plastic button and the non-knurled body surface it can be used quickly and securely without destroying the tissue of my pants, which are not mil-spec but normal civilian pants. While it will certainly look awkward in an “official” environment, this carry-method is well suited for standard outdoor usage. The scalloped bezel does not sport really sharp edges either which greatly helps in this regard, too.
The batteries are rather loose in the tube which permits the use of rechargeables if you really have to go in that direction /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crackup.gif. Although this is a very cool feature for some of us, I do not care for rechargeables on a personal level. Battery rattle is eliminated nicely though; no concern here.
One problem is the tailcap: while it works flawlessly, I would have preferred a not aggressively guarded cap for tailstand ability (which may be important for general illumination in non-tactical environments) and protection against unwanted activation during backpack-carry of the light. In my world I do not use holsters and such things to carry a light, it is either in my pocket, coat pocket or backpack. A little bit less convenient the secure lockout has to be achieved by unscrewing the tailcap.
At first I was astonished that the selection ring was made of “plastic”, but it has proven itself grippy and functional and I have no complaints here.
The anodise: The purplish tint of the head and tail section might annoy certain anal people, though I personally do like it. It is much more pronounced in digital photos than in reality I have observed.
I forced my girl to take the U2 in the bathtub with her and change brightness every now and then for about 30 minutes … it passed the test with flying banners, no leak.
One last comment on construction: the domed window is very classy looking. If it does anything good to the beam or is more sturdy I cannot tell and certainly do not want to find out the hard way.

An interesting question: since I do not see any method of unscrewing the selection ring, how is it serviceable once dirty or otherwise compromised?


Ergonomics

In addition to the points already raised above, there is one thing I immediately noticed upon grabbing the U2 for the first time: it fits my hand perfectly, just as if it was made to be there. I have average male hands with some extra fat, so my experience should be quite similar for everyone, which is a major asset of this light. In a standard non-tactical grip (light down pointed forward) the thumb and index finger sit perfectly on the selection ring and have just the right range of possible movement to dial all available levels without changing grip or doing some other uncomfortable manoeuvre. And without having to spend mental energy that is needed elsewhere than on the flashlight.
That brings me to point number two: ease of use. The U2’s switching method is very intuitive and
a) doesn’t require a learning curve to use it for the first time and
b) does not require extra thoughts while using it that could detract from the main activity.
I have given the light to two other non-flashaholic persons and they were able to figure it out in less than 1 minute.
In a tactical grip (light up) brightness selection is not possible one-handed, at least not easily enough to be worth while; for me, that is. But with a pre-dialled brightness the U2 is fine just like any other Surefire.
In the end the switching method provides the best compromise currently available and unites the best assets of the two worlds
Comparing the U2 switch with the McE2S / L1 / L2 / A2 type of switch, the U2 offers more and fully regulated modes of operation and it has a clicky. The drawback is the lack of a momentary instant-high beam.
Size-wise the U2 is too big for EDC, it is the classical “grab” or “task” light that can be conveniently carried if so desired, fits perfectly in your hand and offers everything you’d expect from such a light. I just wouldn’t want to have it on me 24/7, but I do not think this was the intention behind this light anyway.
The switch needs just the right pressure to activate momentarily and constantly, just as the selection ring has the right kind of resistance to comfortably dial the amount of light you want. This leads us to …


The LIGHT and how it performs

And I’ll start with a problem: after running a complete set of batteries through the light on high lying on a table without cooling the selection ring got kind of “cranky”. While the unit becomes very hot the ring sometimes develops excess resistance and turns roughly thus making it difficult to dial the amount of light desired. After cooling everything went back to normal
Apart from that, the ring performs admirably and the “in-between” levels are barely noticeable at all. One neat feature is the fact that the U2, once the batteries start to get weak, just jumps down one level no matter the position of the ring. This is great because
a) no flickering worth mentioning occurs and
b) it serves as some kind of battery indicator (which is a feature I am really missing in all lights currently available)
After the initial disappointment I am not missing the detents on the ring any more. High and low are easy to find at the end of the movement of the ring, and the intermediate levels are just between those points. Nothing more is necessary, and every click would mean something that can wear off …
The “soft start” feature is also nice for me because it is easier on the eyes, but it may be less desirable for a tactical environment where the instant light of LEDs is a plus. Whether this really is a feature or just a by-product of the electric wizardry I do not know though.
Heat is only a problem when left on without cooling on high; I could run one complete set of batteries through it on high while doing a hike at about 10°C outside temperature without the light overheating. And this was of course an artificial “high performance” since the U2 could have done the job very well a few levels lower.
Let’s finally talk about light. The spacing of the six levels is very well done, there is a distinct step between each level up and down, and those steps seem evenly distributed to my eyes, which makes it easy and intuitive to choose the right setting immediately. I would have preferred that the lowest level be a little lower still since right now it is still more than necessary to navigate a pitch black house and will disrupt night vision. High, of course, is quite bright and overly sufficient for all tasks I encountered. It easily lights up the landscape at 75m in an adequate manner to make out enough details and reaches even further with less optimal results of course. The power of the U2 leaves nothing in the dark, but it is still beaten by an X3T driven at 750mA for total output (at least my eyes tell me this) and by a LuxIII in a McLux-PR for throw.
I got about 45 min constant-on on high until the highest level fell out of regulation which is what I expected of this light and this satisfies me 100% as the highest level is seldom necessary and the runtime in the lower levels should be greatly superior. On lowest level the light can stay on for about two days, roughly speaking. This versatility is the biggest positive argument the U2 has on its side … just the right amount of light for every task with an immense runtime because you rarely need 100lm but you’ve got them when you call for them! That’s it! The grail.
The beam is what Don calls a “ram of light” ©McGizmo2004. Rather concentrated spill with a good hotspot and in my unit, unfortunately, a donut hole. As this cannot be corrected in production lights I won’t explore on it. I personally would have preferred a beam a little wider, something between the L4 and the U2, but I know I am a “medium-flood-man” and most others prefer throw, so the beam of the U2 should be right on target with almost everyone. With the U2 I need to swing the light around to view a room or my garden from the 1st floor window whereas with a 5W in a PR I have a better coverage which is more convenient to navigate at the expense of throw. As I personally rarely need throw it does not matter and I’d prefer this setting, the U2 however covers a wider range of applications (such as spotting something while doing a night hike.


Conclusion

The U2 Ultra is not a wow-light or the eye-scorcher to impress your grandma. It is, however, the most versatile general illumination tool I have encountered so far, a true Jack-of-all-trades without a major drawback or weakness. While it is beaten by some other high-end flashlights in several single aspects of illumination, no other light I have ever held in my hands is able to master ALL aspects and needs of general portable lighting to the extend the U2 does.
If I had to choose one single light to own, it would be the Surefire U2 Ultra with Don’s custom McLux-PR BB750 X3T with McE2S being a very close second.

bernhard
 
Once again Bernie demonstrates his excellent command of English. Excellent review!

(but hey Bernie, nobody's perfect - there IS a torch with a battery indicator light)... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/nana.gif
 
Hey Charlie ... thanx /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif ... and /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif ... yepp, I goofed here, I admit.
IIRC the LH can indicate battery power (can it?), the Eternalight EliteMax comes also to mind as well as my new headlamp and the KenRad divelight, the MR-X ... and the Opalec /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
I am so obsessed with battery indicators that I mostly think of the lights that don't have one ... and almost any light comes without it.

"You have a hole in your mind ..." (Bab5) /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

bernie
 
Oops, you're right Bernie, I was really only thinking of the Opalec NewBeam but you remind me there are many...including my brother-in-law's Streamlight Argo headlamp (and naw, the LH doesn't have one).
 
Hey Bernhard- do you have any pictures of the waterproof test in action? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/naughty.gif

Nice, well thought review!
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Hello Bernhard,

Excellent comments.

It looks like there is provision for a spanner to fit inside the head. I wonder if the threaded part of the light unscrews from the head allowing access to the circuit board and the dimming ring.

Tom
 
As always Bernie thanks for a good review and an honest one. It's hard to be TOO honest though when a light costs over $250.00 and one just receives it!

I'm a fan of simple 2-stage lights and one with low, (actually low, LOW), and high are enough for me. My FF with reflector and 2-stage and my KL5 on a L4 body with one of Don's 2-stages fits all my needs for multiple level lights.
 
Gene ... agreed on the 2-stage ... BUT beyond a certain brightness, a medium level is desirable IMHO. This "threshhold" is easily reached with the 100lm of the U2 and so I am glad it has more than 2 levels. But I am totally with you ... for weaker and smaller ligths the McE2S is king unless you prefer the uC-controlled lights like the HDS, Arc4, LH, ...

Tom ... the head unscrews of course, but I didn't go any fiurther than that. What exactly do you want to do to the poor light? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Fitz ... no pic /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif ... I was happy enough with the situation and did not dare to ask for pics /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

sithjedi ... thanx.

Charlie ... yepp, a lot of headlamps seem to have an indicator, dive lights, too, but production torches are really behind is this regard. Unfortunately.

bernie
 
Thanks for your review Bernhard!

I've had similar experiences and have similar conclusions too.
The dial does not make electrical contact with the inside of the body at all. The dial features a magnet and there are Hall effect sensors inside the Lamp Module to detect where the dial is. Therefore there is no possibility of water getting in at the dial. There are also no contacts to wear out.

You can find the dial's magnet using a metal paperclip.

The lens has no light focusing characteristics. I understand the domed lens can be stronger for less thickness compared to a flat lens. I doubt you will be able to "Apart, undone, dismantle, disect, disassemble" the U2.

The use-a-bility of the U2 for each user is something better evalated over time. I found it took a while for me to see a need for the 'mid four levels'. Usually I need either low or high - I'm very much a fan of the two-stage switch.

Al
 
Ehhhh, doodlebugs!!!
Somebody beat me to evaluating a SureFire U2 Digital Ultra... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif

(JUST KIDDING!!!) Nicely done evaluation Bernhard!!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/happy14.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
Size15's said:
The lens has no light focusing characteristics. I understand the domed lens can be stronger for less thickness compared to a flat lens. I doubt you will be able to "Apart, undone, dismantle, disect, disassemble" the U2.

The use-a-bility of the U2 for each user is something better evalated over time. I found it took a while for me to see a need for the 'mid four levels'. Usually I need either low or high - I'm very much a fan of the two-stage switch.

Al

[/ QUOTE ]

Cool review, Bernhard, though I do wonder what the multi-stage switch's durability is going to be like, given the materials involved and the relative complexity of the switching. Anyone know if UV light will break down Nitrolon quickly, or if it can withstand that sort of thing for a while? That'd be a consideration for a light that is worn outside on a daily basis on one's belt, IMO.

As far as the domed shape, Al, I think the reason they went with that is because it does decrease the weight of the lens a wee bit, as the U2 there is reportedly a tad front-heavy already. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif The dome allows the lens a bit more strength under stress situations - sudden compression from the sides due to a drop, IIRC, would be one such situation. You're right about the extra strength there, and the extra Pyrex or whatever material they're using for the lens would either increase the weight or else keep more of the light from escaping, even with AR coatings.

The extra levels probably have their place, though I'm not sure how applicable most will be, unless you've got very specific situations where a medium-bright light will be more useful than a low light or high light. Anyone tried using these variable levels in a variety of instances to see what worked better? Reading signs from 50 yards away versus reading maps, or scanning the contents of a shelf from inside, versus trying to peer across a parking lot? I'm trying to figure out where the multi-stage functionality comes into its own.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Kiessling said:
Some impressions.

bernhard

[/ QUOTE ]

After reading this and other's reviews I think I must have gotten a really good unit. The ring does not tighten up when the light gets really hot. I checked my low-high tint on a variety of surfaces and colors and cannot tell a difference between either one. They're both green! haha Kidding!
 
Hello Haesslich,

I run into the need for variable brightness quite often at work.

I inspect things looking for cracks and other flaws.

In bright sunlight, I utilize an 8NX to light up the shadows to check things out. As the sun goes down, I switch to my L4 with McGizmo's two stage tail cap. As my eyes become adjusted to darker conditions, the low setting is all I need, unless something looks out of order. I then confirm what I am seeing with a brighter look at things.

I have 3 levels of brightness, with two lights. The U2 may be able to do both jobs in one light. It is also cheaper than what I have invested in the two other lights, and has some additional brightness levels...

Tom
 
Thanks for the feedback, Tom - that's the sort of example I was looking for. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif But is the maximum setting on an LED light (100+ lumens) going to outdo the 8NX in terms of illumination? That's my only question in there, since I wasn't aware of any major changes in brightness with the U2.
 
Hello Haesslich,

The 8NX is rated 110 lumens and I have been comparing its beam with the U2. The 8NX is a bit more powerful, but not by much.

Tom
 
Great review Bernhard /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/happy14.gif
The problem is, that now I have to buy an U2 /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/broke.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 
Bernhard,

Thanks for taking the time in your so eloquent fashion and giving us your take on the U2! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbsup.gif I added a flip up beam shapper to my U2 and now have even greater range of illumination options not to mention a much better flood for inclose work. I need a good moveable light source for my stereo microscope and soldering station. With a fat Pila and adjustable stalk, the U2 is now serving me in this capacity between mobile deployments. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif
 
I don't have a U2 and all the seperate threads on this subject makes it a little confusing to me but I have some thoughts.

Some say that the U2 is too big. Maybe it is too big for some and small for others. It is larger then the L4 but thats quite a small 2x123 light is the Aleph is also a small 2x123 light. Then again the U2 seems to be not that big when you look at so many other lights such as a 2D mag mod that have been popular out here.

Would I EDC one. Nope, I would semi EDC one, hmmm, guess you can't semi EDC one. I might carry one 40% of the time as a guess.

If I had one and all the other lights that I would like to have. It really might be the choice for the times that I was only going to carry one light due to its brightness settings. Its a tactical light and utility light all in one package.

If I was carrying a light for Tactical use and could carry another 6volt light as well, I would certainly consider carring it. I would have a pure bright fighting light as a tactical light that ony had bright as the setting and not use it for utility functions as all. The U2 would cover all the utility functions with its versatility and that would mean that I could always be assured of having topped off batteries. It would also act as a tactical light backup.

If I were carrying many lights I might not carry a U2 at all. The various lights that I carry might cover all of the things that the U2 does in that case.

I do like the Bezel down clip and think the U2 would be an great light for the console or glove box when not being carried.

Let say you have your keychain light, your L4 or other light on your person. If you felt the need for a really versital light as you exit your car, Just clip it on your belt and go, no holster to thread and all of that stuff.

I really do like the sounds of a U2 and would like to have one someday. I think it would get alot of use in the car, around the house and on my person sometimes.

If I did have a U2 I do still think the Aleph and L4 would be my favorite 6 volt lights for different reasons but the U2 would still be a work horse.

I think the comments by Don are really significant. He makes a 6 volt light and it shows lots of class for him to make good comments on a light other than his.

Don does not do that hard sell on his products but I can tell you they are first rate.

Buy a light from Don and get the U2 both. Don can make you a nice throw monster and the U2 can be the clip on light that can do lots of jobs well.
 
Excellent review. I eagerly await my U2s.....
 
Back
Top