clumma
Newly Enlightened
Lights/specs:
Fenix TK11 R2 (smooth reflector)
Lumens: 240 60
Hours: 2.7 12
EagleTac T10L (OP reflector)
Lumens: 255 60
Hours: 2 13
Informal regulation test:
- load fresh pair 18650 Li-ion cells* into lights
- run on high until both lights off
- subjectively compare brightness at several checkpoints
- measure time between 1st and 2nd shutdowns
* Ultrafire 3.7V 2400mAh protected (yes I know I should try it
again with decent batteries, but from experience it seems I got
a reasonably well-matched pair of these)
Results:
The T10L did indeed shutdown first, and the TK11 kept going about
30 minutes longer. The two lights were fairly evenly matched for
output until around the time the T10L shut down, when the TK11's
brightness really started to fall off. EagleTac told me they
believe the T10L's regulation to be the best in the industry on
18650, and they may well be right.
Remarks:
The T10L has both a tighter spot and wider spill than the TK11,
which is hard to argue with at the end of the day. The TK11 does
deliver better throw, but not by much (and with a pronounced
doughnut). The T10L's beam is of superior quality overall, with
perfect blend between spot and spill and excellent uniformity out
to a razor-sharp edge.
The TK11 never got more than warm to the touch during the test,
whereas the T10L got quite hot. Whether this is due to the
greater efficiency of the R2 LED, better thermal management in
the TK11, or the extra 15 lumens the EagleTac is said to produce
I cannot say.
I find the EagleTac clicky has a wonderfully crisp feel to it.
The T10L can tailstand (which for me is a very handy feature) yet
its switch is, if anything, easier for me to operate. I've seen
people with "large hands" complain about it, so YMMV. The
softness of the TK11's switch does makes it harder to articulate
signals with momentary-on.
The TK11's chassis is beefier than the T10L's, and resists rolling
even without a clip. Its crenelated bezel is an advantage from
my point of view, though 4sevens sells crenelated bezels for
EagleTac lights for about $10 a pop (you can buy 3 with your
T10L for the price of a TK11 R2).
It isn't all roses for the T10L, though. As with my P10C, it's
possible to untwist the tailcap a bit when trying to adjust the
brightness and vice versa. No such problem with the Fenix.
Also, after about a month of ownership and without any undue
insult to the light, a battery contact fell off the PCB in the
T10L's head. I sent the light back to EagleTac per their
instructions, but it took them almost 2 months (!) with numerous
reminders from me to return it. A review on eagletac-store.com
reports the same experience.
With the T10L back in hand, however, it's hard to remember
anything bad about it. The TK11 is going in the kitchen drawer.
-Carl
Fenix TK11 R2 (smooth reflector)
Lumens: 240 60
Hours: 2.7 12
EagleTac T10L (OP reflector)
Lumens: 255 60
Hours: 2 13
Informal regulation test:
- load fresh pair 18650 Li-ion cells* into lights
- run on high until both lights off
- subjectively compare brightness at several checkpoints
- measure time between 1st and 2nd shutdowns
* Ultrafire 3.7V 2400mAh protected (yes I know I should try it
again with decent batteries, but from experience it seems I got
a reasonably well-matched pair of these)
Results:
The T10L did indeed shutdown first, and the TK11 kept going about
30 minutes longer. The two lights were fairly evenly matched for
output until around the time the T10L shut down, when the TK11's
brightness really started to fall off. EagleTac told me they
believe the T10L's regulation to be the best in the industry on
18650, and they may well be right.
Remarks:
The T10L has both a tighter spot and wider spill than the TK11,
which is hard to argue with at the end of the day. The TK11 does
deliver better throw, but not by much (and with a pronounced
doughnut). The T10L's beam is of superior quality overall, with
perfect blend between spot and spill and excellent uniformity out
to a razor-sharp edge.
The TK11 never got more than warm to the touch during the test,
whereas the T10L got quite hot. Whether this is due to the
greater efficiency of the R2 LED, better thermal management in
the TK11, or the extra 15 lumens the EagleTac is said to produce
I cannot say.
I find the EagleTac clicky has a wonderfully crisp feel to it.
The T10L can tailstand (which for me is a very handy feature) yet
its switch is, if anything, easier for me to operate. I've seen
people with "large hands" complain about it, so YMMV. The
softness of the TK11's switch does makes it harder to articulate
signals with momentary-on.
The TK11's chassis is beefier than the T10L's, and resists rolling
even without a clip. Its crenelated bezel is an advantage from
my point of view, though 4sevens sells crenelated bezels for
EagleTac lights for about $10 a pop (you can buy 3 with your
T10L for the price of a TK11 R2).
It isn't all roses for the T10L, though. As with my P10C, it's
possible to untwist the tailcap a bit when trying to adjust the
brightness and vice versa. No such problem with the Fenix.
Also, after about a month of ownership and without any undue
insult to the light, a battery contact fell off the PCB in the
T10L's head. I sent the light back to EagleTac per their
instructions, but it took them almost 2 months (!) with numerous
reminders from me to return it. A review on eagletac-store.com
reports the same experience.
With the T10L back in hand, however, it's hard to remember
anything bad about it. The TK11 is going in the kitchen drawer.
-Carl