anthroPelexis
Newly Enlightened
hey, i found that they make the cells that most of these light use in recharge style, anybody use them? any recomendations?
TigerhawkT3 said:If you mean the Tenergy 3.0V RCR123A cells available at places like batteryjunction, I have those and can comment on them.
They basically have no self-discharge, so you won't have to worry about them like you would with NiMHs. However, you'll get about half the runtime as compared to primary (non-rechargeable) CR123As. They're best for LED lights, as they can't handle the current draw of most high-powered (Surefire) incan lights. They're about a third of a millimeter longer and a tenth of a millimeter wider than primaries, so they won't fit in all lights (I had some issues getting them to work in a VB-16, and needed some aluminum foil to make it mostly work).
If you use CR213A lights frequently, they can be a good value.
Hermanator said:Are you serious about "basically have no self-discharge"? That would be a major selling point to me using the CR123As; I'm okay with short runtime if I can recharge it and there is little self-discharge!
TigerhawkT3 said:If you mean the Tenergy 3.0V RCR123A cells available at places like batteryjunction, I have those and can comment on them.
They basically have no self-discharge, so you won't have to worry about them like you would with NiMHs. However, you'll get about half the runtime as compared to primary (non-rechargeable) CR123As. They're best for LED lights, as they can't handle the current draw of most high-powered (Surefire) incan lights. They're about a third of a millimeter longer and a tenth of a millimeter wider than primaries, so they won't fit in all lights (I had some issues getting them to work in a VB-16, and needed some aluminum foil to make it mostly work).
If you use CR213A lights frequently, they can be a good value.
anthroPelexis said:hey, i found that they make the cells that most of these light use in recharge style, anybody use them? any recomendations?