Gransee
Flashlight Enthusiast
I got this email this morning:
I had botten a arc aaa a couple weeks ago and shipped through fedex. Got my light in 4 days and was so happy with it I ordered another one a day later. Shipped through USPS and i never got the package. I know you have a disclaimer about USPS but if lights get stolen you should not even give the option!! If I donot get my light I will cancle my payment and you will not get paid!
If you remember, years ago we only offered FedEx as an option because of the problems with USPS. You begged me to provide USPS as an option and I finally did but on the condition it was your responsibility. It also says this on our website. This person evidently knows about this already.
First off, if you don't know already: it is our experience that USPS looses more packages than Fedex. Occasionally we will get people who can't believe USPS looses packages. Simply: they don't have experience shipping as many packages as we do. When you ship a small number and have no problems, this is called anecdotal evidence. Same thing if you walk into a casino and hear machines paying out. Typically, USPS looses about 6 of our packages each Christmas. The claims process takes usually 90 days and they rarely pay out. This costs money.
Another thing people may not understand. The concept of Transparent Cost. Question: When we pay for a lost package or spend time on a claim, who really pays for this in the end? If you are customer who always selects FedEx and never has a problem, are you ok with paying a small amount on your next order for the customers who choose USPS? If we are refunding lost shipments then you are doing this anyways. Wealth redistribution. Taking the money of responsible people to pay for the decisions of those who like to take bigger risks for the chance of an immediate payout.
If you are the person taking the risks, you want other people to foot the bill when your chute doesn't open. If you are the person who is more careful and works hard for a living, the feeling is a bit different. We want people to be well and make good choices. Maybe the best way to do that is to let them experience the full result of their choices from time to time.
How would you respond to the customer above? Usually people ask for an exception in their case, admit their mistake, etc, In that case, we choose to take your money (by spreading the costs) to provide them assistance. But what about a person who doesn't think they choose a risky path and has a sense of entitlement? Do you still want to pay for his mistake?
peter
I had botten a arc aaa a couple weeks ago and shipped through fedex. Got my light in 4 days and was so happy with it I ordered another one a day later. Shipped through USPS and i never got the package. I know you have a disclaimer about USPS but if lights get stolen you should not even give the option!! If I donot get my light I will cancle my payment and you will not get paid!
If you remember, years ago we only offered FedEx as an option because of the problems with USPS. You begged me to provide USPS as an option and I finally did but on the condition it was your responsibility. It also says this on our website. This person evidently knows about this already.
First off, if you don't know already: it is our experience that USPS looses more packages than Fedex. Occasionally we will get people who can't believe USPS looses packages. Simply: they don't have experience shipping as many packages as we do. When you ship a small number and have no problems, this is called anecdotal evidence. Same thing if you walk into a casino and hear machines paying out. Typically, USPS looses about 6 of our packages each Christmas. The claims process takes usually 90 days and they rarely pay out. This costs money.
Another thing people may not understand. The concept of Transparent Cost. Question: When we pay for a lost package or spend time on a claim, who really pays for this in the end? If you are customer who always selects FedEx and never has a problem, are you ok with paying a small amount on your next order for the customers who choose USPS? If we are refunding lost shipments then you are doing this anyways. Wealth redistribution. Taking the money of responsible people to pay for the decisions of those who like to take bigger risks for the chance of an immediate payout.
If you are the person taking the risks, you want other people to foot the bill when your chute doesn't open. If you are the person who is more careful and works hard for a living, the feeling is a bit different. We want people to be well and make good choices. Maybe the best way to do that is to let them experience the full result of their choices from time to time.
How would you respond to the customer above? Usually people ask for an exception in their case, admit their mistake, etc, In that case, we choose to take your money (by spreading the costs) to provide them assistance. But what about a person who doesn't think they choose a risky path and has a sense of entitlement? Do you still want to pay for his mistake?
peter
Last edited: