a4d
Enlightened
Really i don't know I'm not tring to start an argument i really was just wwondering. Mainly i'm asking this because it seems like there is alot of lights alot cheaper that seem to be just as good if not better?
No i've never own one, i could see what you say you'd have to own it to appreciate it.Not to sound mean, but have you ever used or owned a SF? One must actually handle it to appreciate it...
I don't have too many SFs and so my comment is therefore may not be the whole picture.
IMO, SF are better at the incandescents. Look at the A2s, the 9Ns (and now 9AN), the 6P / 9P, the M3 / M4, they are very good (if not the best) in their own niche.
On the other hand, however, SF seems to lag behind in the LEDs. They have just released the newer generation LED lights, lagging behind in the curve. No matter how strong a light is built, how good is the workmanship, a light (especially LED light) is rated on the lumens output and the run-time as perhaps the number one and two criteria.
-- ymfymf
I don't have too many SFs and so my comment is therefore may not be the whole picture.
IMO, SF are better at the incandescents. Look at the A2s, the 9Ns (and now 9AN), the 6P / 9P, the M3 / M4, they are very good (if not the best) in their own niche.
On the other hand, however, SF seems to lag behind in the LEDs. They have just released the newer generation LED lights, lagging behind in the curve. No matter how strong a light is built, how good is the workmanship, a light (especially LED light) is rated on the lumens output and the run-time as perhaps the number one and two criteria.
Yeah that was kind of dumb of them. The way they have runtime for the G3L listed is how they should have listed the 6PL and G2L runtime.Conservative on lumen ratings, but exaggerated on runtimes. For example, their 11 and 12 hour runtimes for the 6PL and G2L respectively are more like 3.5 and 4.5 hours, respectively.