I wonder if SF stated they were using Cree XR-E P4 bin, or Q2 bin, if people would say "I'll wait until they use Q5, or R2". Maybe SF doesn't use the latest and greatest bins, as long as they can get what they feel is exceptable output from an older bin, like P4's, Q2's, etc. If they want 65, 80, 100, etc, lumens out the front they don't need a Q5 or R2 to do that, but if they state they are using anything but the latest and greatest bins maybe that would lose them sales, although I doubt the majority of their customers would care what bin LED is in their lights, it would just be a select few. However, a select few can cause bad PR if they are running around saying "SF uses older, lower efficient, LED bins in their lights!"
So if SF doesn't tell us exactly what they are using they are free to sell lights with any bin Cree they feel like using, as long as it meets their min spec. I wouldn't be surprised if there were L1 Cree's with P4's, and now there are some with Q2's, Q5's, etc. This may explain why my L1 Cree is brighter than my E1B when the L1 is rated at 65 lumens and the E1B is rated at 80 lumens.
Of course this is just speculation.
I just think giving LED specs isn't important to SF. As long as their flashlights perform up to the specs and standards they want and their customers expect, that's good enough. I'm perfectly fine with that. SF will sell something that has proven itself in their testing. If you want the absolute latest and greatest with no hidden specs, with no real track record, you can buy other brands.