Sorry for the unintended criticism. Please allow me to rephrase.
Again, just curious, on an average DAY, what do you use your EDC light for?
Sorry for the unintended criticism. Please allow me to rephrase.
I agree with the OP, for a light that you carry during the day, higher output is usually sensible. Perhaps my eyes are not as sensitive as others on here so I don't understand complaints of medium light levels being uncomfortable. Don't get me wrong, if I'm night-adapted I can see around on a fraction of a lumen, but it doens't hurt my eyes to blast 20, 50 or even 200. Have you never woken up and turned on the lights? It isn't that big of a deal.
Why on freakin earth I would ever want 1600 lumens coming on first in any situation is beyond me.
No, it isn't. The human body is AMAZING at adapting. JUST TODAY, I did a little test with a 300 lumen light (S-mini), while working in a fairly dark basement. I wanted to test to see if there was any validity to all the talk about using a light in HIGH ruining your "night vision". I was checking things out in a small dark corner of the basement, even made sure to shine on a reflective surface, less than 4' from my eyes, and then immediately after turning the light off, I counted how many seconds it took for my eyes to adjust to the level in which they could see prior to turning the light on in the first place (my normal night vision). It took THREE seconds. That's all. 3 little seconds for my eyes to re-adapt. Hardly the problem that many make it out to be. Now I realize that we all have different eyes, but I'm guessing I don't have super-human eyes that are capable of re-adjusting any faster than the average fellow. I did this test 3 times.
I have nothing to add to this discussion other than that which mode you want your light to start on is really personal preference. Because it is personal preference I will not try to convince you that low first lights are the way to go nor would I expect you to try to convince me that high first lights are more logical. I've already made up my mind which I prefer and nothing posted here will change my mind just like nothing posted here will cause you to change your mind.
If it only took three seconds to readjust then your eyes really weren't dark adapted in the first place, at least not to any significant extent, and/or the corner wasn't especially dark. If your eyes were truly dark adapted then 300 lumens should have appeared searingly bright and taken several seconds for your eyes to adapt to in the first place, and after shutting off the light, it should have appeared pitch black for several seconds afterwards and taken several minutes more for your eyes to regain their previous acuity.No, it isn't. The human body is AMAZING at adapting. JUST TODAY, I did a little test with a 300 lumen light (S-mini), while working in a fairly dark basement. I wanted to test to see if there was any validity to all the talk about using a light in HIGH ruining your "night vision". I was checking things out in a small dark corner of the basement, even made sure to shine on a reflective surface, less than 4' from my eyes, and then immediately after turning the light off, I counted how many seconds it took for my eyes to adjust to the level in which they could see prior to turning the light on in the first place (my normal night vision). It took THREE seconds. That's all. 3 little seconds for my eyes to re-adapt. Hardly the problem that many make it out to be. Now I realize that we all have different eyes, but I'm guessing I don't have super-human eyes that are capable of re-adjusting any faster than the average fellow. I did this test 3 times.
Then your eyes weren't actually dark adjusted before the lights went on. The rhodopsin (a photopigment) in the rods of your retina (the photocells responsible for low light sight) bleach out when exposed to light and take take up to 30 minutes to fully regenerate.
For dark adaption, your 'basement test' of vision is not even close to the mark. You will need a much darker environment to see what it's all about. Many city dwellers who can't see more than the brightest stars in the sky will not find dark enough conditions outdoors at night to know what this is about. Everywhere is a street light or porch light to spoil your night vision anyway.
Wise words from PCC. Since there are so many different UI available, simply choose one that suits your needs. We could debate this forever and never come to a mutually agreeable conclusion.
Then your eyes weren't actually dark adjusted before the lights went on. The rhodopsin (a photopigment) in the rods of your retina (the photocells responsible for low light sight) bleach out when exposed to light and take take up to 30 minutes to fully regenerate.
For night use outdoors, it's about balance. The flashlight only lights a relatively small area. The brighter it is, the more your pupils contract and night vision ability is compromised, the less you see outside of the lighted area. This is where only enough light as is required is an advantage.
If this stuff isn't important to you; no big deal, it's not your problem. Use and choose your light for your usage.
Most of the big lumen big throw light are no use to me either.
........JUST TODAY, I did a little test with a 300 lumen light (S-mini), while working in a fairly dark basement. ..................
I'm not sure what profit there is to your condescending tone, as if you're the only person on these forums who uses your flashlight in the real-world. While a lot of folks here are collectors, they also carry and use their flashlights on a daily basis, so your experiences are not somehow more "correct" than theirs.It should be noted that a "flashaholic" is not necessarily one who USES their lights a LOT, but rather, one who is addicted to buying more and more flashlights. In other words, it is quite possible that MOST "flashaholics" may be very knowledgeable about things written on paper, and yet rarely USE their lights for practical applications (developing a realization that things in the real world are not as they are on paper).
I'm not sure how much value all this theoretical lingo has to the ACTUAL everyday usage of a guy with average eyesite, with an average job. My "test" was in a REAL environment which a LOT of guys are in, while at work, with their flashlights.
I'm not sure what profit there is to your condescending tone, as if you're the only person on these forums who uses your flashlight in the real-world. While a lot of folks here are collectors, they also carry and use their flashlights on a daily basis, so your experiences are not somehow more "correct" than theirs.
Thing is, nobody is saying or even implying that high power is not useful in some situations, but the question was asked why some (apparently most) people prefer low as default, and the question has been answered. To suggest that we only hold this opinion based on "things written on paper" rather than our own practical experience is absurd.
It's all in fun. Just chattin' with fellow flashaholics. No harm done. I can accept that I am certainly in the minority.
Jonny
Since I'm also a lone voice in the wilderness , I'll re-iterate my point from earlier: for me, the mere fact that someone is talking about an order means they're tolerating a mediocre, our-engineers-are-barely-even-trying UI. These days, there are loads of well-designed UIs out there, from rings to Aeon-style or NC EZ-style twist-through to clever single-button approaches like HDS or ZL or Photon or any other number. For me, the problem isn't the order of the modes, the problem is that there's an order at all ... don't accept mediocrity in your UI, and you'll be much happier. Of course, if you'd done that, we wouldn't be having this fun thread; instead, everyone who has that light would simply be turning it on in the right level for them, and we'd all have to find something else to complain about