Hi Guys,
I currently use the MRC Super Brain 960 (http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXRST9) to test all my batteries. I do this by simply touching the provided alligator clips (which come from the charging port off the 960) to the + and - terminals of the battery.
I check the volts on all my cells when new, and periodically check the volts of the batteries in my EDCs.
New SF 123s will always read between 3.25-3.27 volts, exhausted ones lower and so forth.
Looking at the ZTS tester which many people here recommend, I see it only gives a percentage of the capacity of cell.
Which is more accurate? It would seem that the exact volt reading would be better than 20% increments. Any reason to by a ZTS when I can currently test all my cells with my charger?
I currently use the MRC Super Brain 960 (http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXRST9) to test all my batteries. I do this by simply touching the provided alligator clips (which come from the charging port off the 960) to the + and - terminals of the battery.
I check the volts on all my cells when new, and periodically check the volts of the batteries in my EDCs.
New SF 123s will always read between 3.25-3.27 volts, exhausted ones lower and so forth.
Looking at the ZTS tester which many people here recommend, I see it only gives a percentage of the capacity of cell.
Which is more accurate? It would seem that the exact volt reading would be better than 20% increments. Any reason to by a ZTS when I can currently test all my cells with my charger?