this_is_nascar
Flashaholic
Today, I received my NX05 optics for my McLux. Once I cut that little tab off the NX05, that baby popped right in there. I'll comment on the NX05 vs McFlood in a different thread.
Ok, here we go. I took my brightest McLux with the NX05 installed and compared it to my brightest LSH-P. This beamshot is from ~3 feet from a white sliding door. The LSH is on the left and the McLux is on the right.
This picture is pretty true-to-form, meaning the tints you see in the picture are close to reality. I also performed a quick metering test on both of these lights. Both had a new SureFire 123-cell in them and register 3.26 volts at the start. The metering was done prior to the beamshot comparision.
At 3 inches away, the LSH-P registered 7,080 lux. At that same distance, the McLux with the NS05 optics registered 8,500 lux. This makes sense, since the McLux is driving the LED a tad harder. Also, don't forget you pay for this brightness in runtime. This particular McLux get around 1.5 hours of strong light, whereas the LSH gets just over 2 hours.
Ok, here we go. I took my brightest McLux with the NX05 installed and compared it to my brightest LSH-P. This beamshot is from ~3 feet from a white sliding door. The LSH is on the left and the McLux is on the right.
This picture is pretty true-to-form, meaning the tints you see in the picture are close to reality. I also performed a quick metering test on both of these lights. Both had a new SureFire 123-cell in them and register 3.26 volts at the start. The metering was done prior to the beamshot comparision.
At 3 inches away, the LSH-P registered 7,080 lux. At that same distance, the McLux with the NS05 optics registered 8,500 lux. This makes sense, since the McLux is driving the LED a tad harder. Also, don't forget you pay for this brightness in runtime. This particular McLux get around 1.5 hours of strong light, whereas the LSH gets just over 2 hours.