New Reviews on Flashlightreviews.com

kelmo · Jul 17, 2009

Has anybody noticed that flashlightreviews.com has new reviews? It is the same format as Quickbeams material.

kelmo

matrixshaman · Jul 17, 2009

Re: Flashlightreviews.com

Last I heard he had stopped and that the web site might soon be gone. Interesting to see the change and very good news.

gswitter · Jul 17, 2009

The contact address is now curt@flashlightreviews..., so I'm guessing Doug did end up selling the domain (and the content).

Crenshaw · Jul 17, 2009

it looks....the same......totally the same..:thinking:

Crenshaw

Mjolnir · Jul 17, 2009

Some of the reviews on that site seem to be exactly the same (textwise, not layoutwise) as the corresponding Light-reviews.com review (such as the T10L review).

Crenshaw · Jul 17, 2009

and further, a review of an L1P aint exactly very recent is it....hmmmmm :thinking:

Crenshaw

jzmtl · Jul 17, 2009

I see no new reviews.

kavvika · Jul 17, 2009

I accidentally stumbled upon this review this morning: http://www.flashlightreviews.com/reviews/olight_m30.htm

Bullzeyebill · Jul 17, 2009

It is mostly in Quickbeams format. Earned five stars? Have we met the new owner?

Bill

McLux · Jul 18, 2009

There are a few mistakes in that Olight M30 review :
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Light Type: Luxeon I LED
[/FONT]Battery life a little short with alkalines, probably much better with NiMH.
In a light that uses lithium or 18650's ?

mon90ey · Jul 18, 2009

In addition to the mistakes, I cannot find it listed in the main index list of reviews, either. What gives? :huh2:

Owen · Jul 18, 2009

Maybe it isn't finished, and the "mistakes" are just transposed information that hasn't been edited yet.

sORe-EyEz · Jul 18, 2009

could the errors be work-in-progress?

Burgess · Jul 19, 2009

it's alive

It's Alive

IT'S ALIVE ! ! !

:popcorn:

_

Toohotruk · Jul 20, 2009

Yep, that emitter looks like a four die variety, definitely NOT a Lux I. And the review date is May 2009.

Very interesting...

:popcorn:

Toohotruk · Jul 20, 2009

Look at THIS and THIS and THIS and THIS and THIS (you get the idea), none of which were manufactured until after Doug stopped doing reviews. There are some mistakes on there, like having some of these lights listed as being in the HID class, but nonetheless, they are newer lights. :thinking:

lolzertank · Jul 20, 2009

On the bottom of the home page... "[FONT=Arial Black, Gadget, sans-serif]Enjoy your visit - content of this website is reference by Doug P and light-reviews.com"

[/FONT]Interesting how they listed the Fenix LD20 as a HID flashlight... Now Fenix, when WILL you make a HID LD20? :popcorn:

[FONT=Arial Black, Gadget, sans-serif]

[/FONT]

jzmtl · Jul 20, 2009

Huh, so I guess the guy who bought it is the same guy runs light-reviews.com

Zeruel · Jul 20, 2009

Toohotruk said:
Look at THIS and THIS and THIS and THIS and THIS (you get the idea), none of which were manufactured until after Doug stopped doing reviews. There are some mistakes on there, like having some of these lights listed as being in the HID class, but nonetheless, they are newer lights. :thinking:

Wow... "Jet-Ti M" costs only $67.95. :faint:

I'm going to get 3.

dudemar · Jul 20, 2009

He seems to be in contact with CPF members. His reference to chevrofreak is in the Fenix PD20-CE review.

New Reviews on Flashlightreviews.com

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Enlightened

Flashaholic

Newly Enlightened

Newly Enlightened

Flashlight Enthusiast

Enlightened

Flashaholic

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Enlightened

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Flashlight Enthusiast

Similar threads