Hi everyone, I haven't popped in for a while but I've recently become re-inspired to get something off my chest.
I have become more and more convinced that the lack of a charge indicator in consuming devices is unforgiveable, and can only be explained by laziness or cheapness.
I can't be the only person who resents carrying a spare battery 'just in case' the one in the flashlight is low. It means toting a second, somewhat fragile item, when I really only need the primary tool (which is plenty rugged for the task). Battery management is all very well for regular users - you know how long a full charge gives you - but I have several flashlights in several places, and tend to just grab the nearest when I'm heading somewhere that might be dark. I have NO idea when I last changed its battery, or how much use it's had since then - let alone whether that use was on a high setting or not. It's a crapshoot. I really don't want to have to remove and test (or swap) the battery EVERY time I grab a flashlight and head out, so instead I end up grabbiing a fresh battery, or risk running out of light mid-task.
I have tried (and conceived) a number of different systems to try and solve this, ranging from custom holsters with spare battery compartments, to flashlights with switchable parallel power sources (ie a 'reserve tank'), but at the end of the day the best solution is clearly an onboard charge level indicator of some description.
I realise that yes, flashlights are available with charge indicators. But the vast majority don't, and I wonder why not. It seems like such a no-brainer. The technology is already in so many other battery-powered devices, why not flashlights? Is it too hard? Too bulky? Too expensive? Has it just not dawned on manufacturers (and users) that it would be a really, really useful thing to have (in fact, perhaps more useful than a hundred different strobe modes)?
Or is it just laziness and cheapness?
I'd be interested to know if anyone has a compelling reason for NOT including a basic battery level indicator in a ~$100 flashlight.
I have become more and more convinced that the lack of a charge indicator in consuming devices is unforgiveable, and can only be explained by laziness or cheapness.
I can't be the only person who resents carrying a spare battery 'just in case' the one in the flashlight is low. It means toting a second, somewhat fragile item, when I really only need the primary tool (which is plenty rugged for the task). Battery management is all very well for regular users - you know how long a full charge gives you - but I have several flashlights in several places, and tend to just grab the nearest when I'm heading somewhere that might be dark. I have NO idea when I last changed its battery, or how much use it's had since then - let alone whether that use was on a high setting or not. It's a crapshoot. I really don't want to have to remove and test (or swap) the battery EVERY time I grab a flashlight and head out, so instead I end up grabbiing a fresh battery, or risk running out of light mid-task.
I have tried (and conceived) a number of different systems to try and solve this, ranging from custom holsters with spare battery compartments, to flashlights with switchable parallel power sources (ie a 'reserve tank'), but at the end of the day the best solution is clearly an onboard charge level indicator of some description.
I realise that yes, flashlights are available with charge indicators. But the vast majority don't, and I wonder why not. It seems like such a no-brainer. The technology is already in so many other battery-powered devices, why not flashlights? Is it too hard? Too bulky? Too expensive? Has it just not dawned on manufacturers (and users) that it would be a really, really useful thing to have (in fact, perhaps more useful than a hundred different strobe modes)?
Or is it just laziness and cheapness?
I'd be interested to know if anyone has a compelling reason for NOT including a basic battery level indicator in a ~$100 flashlight.