A recent exchange regarding unanodized tailend threads, lockout, and Surefire got me thinking.
Lockout is possible even with unanodized threads: just design the tailcap so that either a 1/4 or 1/2 twist of the tailcap (from the fully tightened position) breaks contact between the tailcap spring and the negative end of the cell.
Right? What am I missing here? If this true, it means makers who have had to forgo using anodized threads at the tail end due to legal reasons can still provide the lockout feature. Right? And if so, why aren't they doing it?
Lockout is possible even with unanodized threads: just design the tailcap so that either a 1/4 or 1/2 twist of the tailcap (from the fully tightened position) breaks contact between the tailcap spring and the negative end of the cell.
Right? What am I missing here? If this true, it means makers who have had to forgo using anodized threads at the tail end due to legal reasons can still provide the lockout feature. Right? And if so, why aren't they doing it?