RobertMM
Flashlight Enthusiast
Can it be that the 4.2V cell fried something in Sean's EB1T so now it doesn't have a low mode?
Can it be that the 4.2V cell fried something in Sean's EB1T so now it doesn't have a low mode?
Thanks. I thought it might change with newer model. Surefure used to be famous for underestimating in their website.Catalog says 9000 candela.
Just got my replacement EB1T and it doesn't work on low mode either. Low mode is like 80%-100% output & flickers, high mode is solid. So either I'm the unluckiest person in the world or their are a bunch of defective ones out there. And to add insult to injury the tint on the replacement is not as good as the first.
Am looking at those as well. But customs fees keep me from buying. Plus, I rather have the 300lm version.These are now being sold at reasonable prices on eBay since the 300 lumen version has been released, I couldn't resist a Surefire EB1C-A-BK, it's the 200/5 lumen model being sold for just under $90 new.
Am looking at those as well. But customs fees keep me from buying. Plus, I rather have the 300lm version.
I bought this EB1T-A-SL.
It's emitter is different with normal EB1.
I think this is XP-E2. As far as I knew, EB1's emitter is XP-E of 200lm version.
When I saw this XP-E2 version, I thought this is 300lm version. But as 880arm's review, this is just little changed 200lm of EB1 not 300lm.
EB1 XP-E2(?)
EB1 XP-E
Ooooh another variant?
Maybe SF wasn't satisfied with the lux they got from thr XPG2.
Do you notice any difference in output between them?
Yep, I called Surefire and the eb1t is enroute to them to replace it. That seems to be the only way to guarantee a properly working light.